Meta:Requests for adminship/VasilievVV

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a closed Meta-Wiki request. Please do not modify it.

VasilievVV

Support = about 35 (and one positive comment disallowed as a vote); Oppose = 0; Neutral = 0 - 100.0% - Clear consensus to promote. Promoted ++Lar: t/c 17:35, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello!

I request adminship here, because I would like to perform usual maintenance tasks such as dealing with vandals. I'm already a sysop on ruwikibooks, testwiki (also a bureaucrat here), mediawiki site and patroller on ruwiki. I'm also a MediaWiki developer (I have developed features such as mw:Extension:TitleBlacklist) — VasilievV ² 17:19, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Support — well known (for me particularly) and trustworthy user. — 87.250.208.77 17:22, 18 February 2008 (UTC) Sorry, this was an IP of mine... — Kalan ? 17:48, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
OMG SOCK!!! support. --Aphaia 17:52, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support I know you from the Incubator and I can't find any reason why to oppose :) --OosWesThoesBes 17:53, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support --.snoopy.  17:54, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Will be helpful. --Thogo (talk) 18:07, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
support - sure. Cary Bass ^demandez 18:27, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Concordo Alex Pereira ^falaê 18:32, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support. ~ putnik 18:54, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support yes --Nick1915 -^{all you want} 19:25, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support seems sensible. Adambro 20:59, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support good user. Captain panda 21:05, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support of course. --Meno25 22:09, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support, doing lots of good work at various places. --Purodha Blissenbach 00:28, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support Majorly (talk) 00:58, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cbrown1023 talk 01:00, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support - z0mG....--Comet styles 01:49, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support Sure. :) --Az1568 14:47, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support Да! Jon Harald Søby 15:04, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mardetanha 20:24, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
(+)-Hillgentleman 23:35, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- What is this clickable thing in your support and what's it supposed to do? :) ++Lar: t/c 19:04, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  - I tried to make a link for putting a template message at the bottom of the page and save but it does not work. Hillgentleman 10:13, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    - Grrr! --Werdan7^{T @} 23:42, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support Seem 'em around, never heard anything bad, unlikely to delete the spam blacklist. ~Kylu (u|t) 02:12, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Johney 17:54, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
seems reasonable enough and more .ru admins seem a good idea. ++Lar: t/c 19:04, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Lar.--Poetlister 20:41, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support Greeves ^{(talk • contribs)} 23:07, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support --FiLiP ¤ 10:06, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Anonymous Dissident^Talk 11:55, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
No doubt Huji 11:07, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
support —DerHexer (Talk) 11:32, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support. --MF-W 13:03, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nousernamesleft^{copper, not wood} 02:56, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support Rudget . 14:04, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support~~ He's made a great contribution to the software side of things, and his TitleBlacklist extension is great. I'll fully support this. --Whitsun 18:28, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Account is a sock of WiganRunnerEu, per checkuser findings. Comments welcome but vote struck. ++Lar: t/c 02:23, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Who is WiganRunnerEu? He's not blocked here. He's not voted on this RfA. Why was he checked? Majorly (talk) 02:27, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support I think, he will be a useful admin. --Obersachse 18:42, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support --A. B. ^(talk) 00:17, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support Yes. Trustworthy and loyal. — E ^talk 11:52, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]