Meta:Requests for adminship/Spacebirdy
- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a closed Meta-Wiki request. Please do not modify it.
Spacebirdy is active on many Wikimedia projects: an admin on three different language Wiktionaries (de, es, and is) and many other places, and she's also fairly active on Meta. She's made 800+ edits, and is often tagging pages to be deleted. She can obviously be trusted to use the admin bit wisely, even if it might not be that often.
- Thank You for Your confidence, I accepted the nomination after a nice chat in the IRC, thanks --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 16:52, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support as per nomination. Majorly (talk) 16:48, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support weren't you administrator already? I'm amazed! --OosWesThoesBes 16:54, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support. Easy. Thunderhead 17:22, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- + Trustworthy, not new to Wikimedia projects. Cbrown1023 talk 18:34, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support thought Spacebirdy an admin already Cary Bass demandez 19:18, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support - Sure! FrancoGG ( talk ) 19:21, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support--Nick1915 - all you want 20:07, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Nishkid64 (talk) 21:23, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support No one is going to believe me when I join the chorus of those who say "I thought she was one already", but I did. Very friendly and helpful user, and extremely unlikely to blow up the wiki. ++Lar: t/c 00:51, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support - boring but ditto to all the above! --Herby talk thyme 10:03, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support --.anaconda 11:19, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support That's what I call a wonderful idea. --Thogo (talk) 18:02, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Anonymous DissidentTalk 00:17, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support —Pill (talk) 18:05, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Joe 21:04, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Carbon Monoxide 01:25, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support per nom. FloNight 04:19, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support --.snoopy. AKA dario vet · (talk) 05:53, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support - I'm with Bastique on this one..--Cometstyles 12:50, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support --A. B. (talk) 13:19, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support --Marbot 16:04, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Trustworthy and highly competent, what's not to love? EVula // talk // 18:01, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support --Aphaia 13:17, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --A. B. (talk) 13:58, 11 October 2007 (UTC)Double vote. --.anaconda 09:35, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]- Ahh, you already supported. See a few Supports above. :) --Anonymous DissidentTalk 14:10, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Vote closed, promoted.
- --.anaconda 09:35, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- My sincere thanks to all the supporters, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 10:33, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]