Meta:Requests for adminship/Salmanland

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a closed Meta-Wiki request. Please do not modify it.

Salmanland edit

Ending 19 August 2017 10:32 (UTC)

Salmanland (talk • contribs • deleted user contributions • logs • block log • abuse log • CentralAuth • stalktoy) Bureaucrats: user rights management.
So, any statement? Or reason why you are requesting sysop here with ~100 edits and a block on your homewiki? – Ajraddatz (talk) 06:34, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 10:24, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:24, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, noting that this user is blocked in his homewiki and hasn't demonstrated any experience with the sysop role and less edits here. You need more experience. --Ks-M9 ^[disc.] 13:23, 12 August 2017 (UTC).[reply]
Support,Corc vaşington (talk) 06:25, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Void. Sockpuppet vote.

Support,--Tərlan Hüseyn Zamanzadə (talk) 07:26, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Void. Sockpuppet vote.

(Special:Diff/17107571) This is the user's first and only edit so far at Meta-Wiki. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 19:28, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Support--RobertoRoberto (talk) 07:31, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Void. Sockpuppet vote.

(Special:Diff/17107573) User registered today and the vote above is the first and only edit at Meta-Wiki. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 19:28, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose no experience plus the block on ar wp... --Herby ^{talk thyme} 07:46, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per above. Concerns with lack of statement and block on user's home wiki. -FASTILY 18:21, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: All supports are technically sockpuppets of the candidate. I've blocked all of them. --Vituzzu (talk) 19:48, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I move that this RfA be closed as invalid. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 19:57, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Abusing multiple accounts, concern with lack of statement as per FASTILY have described, not now and snow. SA 13 Bro (talk) 08:13, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support an indefinite block. --Rs chen 7754 05:36, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The Support is use to vote for RfA, not use to vote for indef.block. So for your opinion, it should be Oppose Support an indefinite block. SA 13 Bro (talk) 10:43, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Strong oppose —Alvaro Molina (✉ - ✔) 18:52, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose RFA, support for a snow close, and block. Courcelles 00:27, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. No point in continuing with this. Requestor is blocked so he's ineligible for adminship. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 15:20, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above request page is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Comments about this page should be made in Meta:Babel or Meta:Requests for help from a sysop or bureaucrat.