Meta:Requests for adminship/Micki

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a closed Meta-Wiki request. Please do not modify it.

No opposes, clear consensus to promote. Successful RfA. Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 17:21, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Micki

Micki (talk • contribs • count • logs • page moves • block log • CA • email)
End date: 17:37, 27 March 2011 (UTC)

Hi all! I would like to propose Micki for adminship here on meta. He is more than active, and the most edits (over 900) are administrative, like vandal reverts, tagging pages for deletions, transfering files to commons and so on. I think that admin bits will be helpfull for his work here. He is also quite active in SWMT and a global rollbacker.

Admin elswhere: sr.wiki
Page on meta: Yes
E-Mail enabled: Yes

If he accept, I will be happy to support him. --WizardOfOz ^talk 17:25, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I accept. In the last few months I've been more active on this project than before and will probably remain so in the future. I'm an active administrator on sr.wiki, and recently I became an administrator on sr.wikiquote. On my home wiki I mainly engaged in the regular maintenance, so if I get rights I will be able to do the same job here on Meta. micki t 17:37, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support Fine with me - useful user --Herby ^{talk thyme} 17:38, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support As nominator. Herby was even here faster :( --WizardOfOz ^talk 17:39, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support. No issues here. Jafeluv 18:27, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Fine by me. -Barras 18:46, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Sure. Theo10011 19:39, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Sure, why not? Ajraddatz (Talk) 20:28, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Why not? -FASTILY ^(TALK) 21:05, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
yo --Jan eissfeldt 21:53, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support sure. Grunny (talk) 00:27, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mjbmr ^Talk 01:21, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support fr33kman 03:36, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --თოგო ^(D) 10:30, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support –BruTe ^talk 10:45, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support, why not - Hoo man (talk) 17:51, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support, I don't see any problem. Alex Pereira ^falaê 19:09, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Dferg ^{☎ talk} 22:05, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Trijnstel 14:32, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Jon Harald Søby 21:00, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Juliancolton | ^Talk 10:50, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Sa vh ^ñ 21:03, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Vojvoda 15:34, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Maduixa 15:38, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Anton 008 15:42, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Laslovarga 17:39, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]