Meta:Requests for adminship/Effeietsanders

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a closed Meta-Wiki request. Please do not modify it.

Effeietsanders

Hi all,

Being steward, I am hanging around quite some time on meta, and when I bump into an article that is vandalisme etc, it's alwasy not fun to have to wait for a sysop, it's the easiest to do it myself :) So that's why I would like to request adminship on meta. I am a user, originally from nl.wikipedia , but also active on nl.wikibooks (admin on both) and doing sometimes an edit on en.wikipedia, I log at least a few times per day in to meta at the moment, and I am willing to help with the fighting of vandalism and maintaining of protected pages and maybe also in the future importing pages from foundtaionwiki if I find the time for that. You can find my contributions here, and I have activated my emailaddress. That you in advance for considering my request. Effeietsanders 12:26, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

support ON WHEELS! Effeitsanders actvely participated on Meta last year and racked up 571 quality edit. Sure, he can be trusted with any tool whatsoever! MaxSem 12:43, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support, of course ;) guillom 13:07, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support --M/ 13:08, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support and a stroopwafel for our great eia. — Timi chal 13:14, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
support --.anaconda 13:50, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support - of course. ++Lar: t/c 13:56, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support Slade ♠ 14:00, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Marbot 16:12, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Dbl2010 19:03, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Cspurrier 19:07, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support --User:Dario vet/Sign 09:51, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
support -- cliché support etc etc ;-) Redux 16:21, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support, thought he already was one. Kat Walsh (spill your mind?) 18:34, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thupport -- as per Kat, Thunderhead 22:03, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support I don't see any stupid moves by him. Thats a plus. Also he is here a lot, that is another plus. Also I do not think that if he was bad he would get all this support and no opposes. All these reasons why I support him. --Sir James Paul 23:30, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support with my two stroopwafels. Aphaia 16:08, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Naconkantari 16:11, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support; of course. Flcelloguy (A note?) 16:47, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Shanel 08:47, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Pill δ 11:15, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vote closed. Consensus reached, sysop flag granted.: --M/ 13:15, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]