Language committee/May 2011 meeting
Active members of the language committee are going to meet for the first time during the Berlin Hackathon on 13-15 May 2011.
- Amir E. Aharoni
- Antony D. Green
- Gerard Meijssen
- Michael Everson
- Miloš Rančić
- Oliver Stegen (via Skype)
- Robin Pepermans
- Santhosh Thottingal
Schedule and logisticsEdit
- Prinzessinnenstraße 19-20, 10969 Berlin
12:00 - 17:00 (or more if needed)
Fonts (projects) Webfont extension.
- It will be implemented on Translatewiki in preparations for implementation on WMF servers. --Millosh 16:17, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
- (projects) Creating free fonts
(tech) Incubator usability 18788 enable the Incubator extension —SPQRobin
- LangCom will ask WMF staff to implement the extension. Robin will continue to maintain and improve that extension --Millosh 15:45, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
Incubator as "virtualization server" for small Wikimedia projects (for example, http://incubator.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wp/arq/ => http://arq.wikipedia.org/wiki/) Millosh
- (Milos should take conclusion from the table.) --Millosh 14:14, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
(tech) Internationalization bugs 19986 Wikis waiting to be renamed for years (e.g. als -> gsw) —SPQRobin
- Cases like als coul-d be used for one year after the transition.
- Cases zh-min-nan could be used forever after the transition.
14407 CentralAuth global session doesn't include incubator.wikimedia.org —SPQRobin
- LangCom will ask WMF staff to join Incubator to the CentralAuth pool OR Robin would do that in communication with tech staff during Hackathon. --Millosh 15:51, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
6100 Different directionality (rtl/ltr) for interface and content depending on language preference and &uselang —SPQRobin
- Amir will talk about this with developers and report to the Central Committee ;) --Millosh 15:56, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
2399 Unicode normalization "sorts" Hebrew/Arabic/Myanmar vowels wrongly - "RESOLVED LATER", but still pertinent —Amir E. Aharoni
- Amir, Michael and Gerard should talk with Brion and present it on LangCom list (or on Meta) --Millosh 15:32, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
- Conversation with Sj:
- Board can ask LangCom for opinion privately if necessary. --Millosh 17:55, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
- New Language proposal policy:
- Board approval moved to the eligibility point. --Millosh 17:55, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
- LangCom is not asking Board for projects in languages which already have projects. --Millosh 17:55, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
Anyone from any Wikimedia movement body may be an observer of LangCom (read-only access to LangCom's mailing list). Any interested person should contact Jesse of Jon (list admin). --Millosh 17:55, 13 May 2011 (UTC)Those who want to be observers should apply LangCom (the ways would be defined). --Millosh 16:58, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
- Sj is an observer. --Millosh 17:55, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
- Robin will write monthly reports of LangCom's activities. --Millosh 17:55, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
12:00 - 17:00 (or more if needed)
(tech) Private wiki
- We can have supplement instead of private wiki: better archival model and Google Docs for experts directory. --Millosh 12:24, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
(policy) How to deal with macrolanguages
- They will be solved on case by case basis. --Millosh 13:41, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
- Milos will take care about changing policy. --Millosh 13:41, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
- Michael and Robin will take care about Kichwa issue. --Millosh 13:41, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
- Emiliano-Romagnolo Wikipedia should be split. Rewrite rules should be employed. Milos will take care about it. --Millosh 13:41, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
(tech) Localization testing
- Amir will talk with Siebrand and other relevant people about that and report to LangCom. --Millosh 14:25, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
(policy) Western Punjabi issue
- Likely not an issue, but an independent expert should be found (Santhosh). --Millosh 14:41, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
(policy) Simple Wikipedia and other Simple projects.
- Any world language is able to have simple Wikipedia if there is reliable published specification of "simple" (or equivalent) language. --Millosh 15:03, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
- Milos will write proposal for policy change. --Millosh 15:03, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
- "World language" should be defined, as it is about a couple of more languages than UN official languages. --Millosh 15:04, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
(policy) Committee transparency & efficiency
- Cf. talk with Sj from Friday.
(project) Various needs of various languages, including: (1) Written forms for languages with don't have them; and (2) A report on "what is needed" to improve language availability
- Document should be written. --Millosh 16:26, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
12:00 - 17:00 (or more if needed)
(project) Writing systems for languages which don't have them:
- Michael should check what is going on with Nepal issue. --Millosh 15:16, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
(policy) Approving new projects
- Will be done regularly via mailing list.
(policy) Proposals for closing projects
- (tech) Automated request tracking
- (policy) Discussion about membership in Committee
- (project) List of missing Wikipedias
- Milos will make it during the next few days. --Millosh 15:16, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
What should the language committee discuss? Please edit this section and its subsections and propose topics that should be discussed in the meeting.
- Automated archival — public archival of committee discussion is done manually and has suffered as a result; design a semi-automated archival process?
- Automated request tracking — requests are manually tracked using status pages, which are inefficient and rarely updated. Should we invest time into creating an automated tool? Possible features:
- automate some of the checks (e.g., localization completion);
- view all requests by status for prompt processing;
- admin UI to edit manual details (e.g., approval progress or links to archived discussions);
- allow users to submit comments or questions (currently posted to Talk:Language committee)?
- I once made a small tool to facilitate submitting a request  —SPQRobin
- Incubator usability — The incubator currently has several usability problems. What are they and how should they be solved?
- Internationalization bugs — There are many internationalization bugs in MediaWiki, MediaWiki extensions and other software used by the WMF. How can they be solved more quickly? Which bugs need to be solved most urgently to advance the WMF strategic plan?
- 19986 Wikis waiting to be renamed for years (e.g. als -> gsw) —SPQRobin
- 14407 CentralAuth global session doesn't include incubator.wikimedia.org —SPQRobin
- 6100 Different directionality (rtl/ltr) for interface and content depending on language preference and &uselang —SPQRobin
- 2399 Unicode normalization "sorts" Hebrew/Arabic/Myanmar vowels wrongly - "RESOLVED LATER", but still pertinent —Amir E. Aharoni
- Localization testing - When programming, it's not enough to write the code - it must be tested, too. The same goes for localization - it's not just about translating a list of messages, they must be also tested in context. The difference is that there are plenty of methodologies and tools for testing code, as well as books and courses that teach them, but it seems like there are almost no set methodologies for testing localization. See this and this threads on Translators-l; i received almost no replies there. I sent similar questions to many of my friends in the software industry, some of them are experienced testing tools developers and certified software testing expert and none of them had an answer. Since Wikimedia projects are massively multilingual and need quality localization, the WMF can must develop a testing strategy for localization, as well as methodologies and tools. The results can be reused by other projects, as free software and free books. The Langcom can lead this effort.
- Private Wiki or not: discussion. Millosh
- How should Proposals for closing projects be handled? Should langcom take over? —SPQRobin
- Committee transparency & efficiency (in general) —SPQRobin
- Discussion about membership in Committee: At least, introduction of yearly acknowledgment per member will she or he be willing to continue to be a member of LangCom. Millosh 09:19, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
- How to deal with macrolanguages? For example, on the Quechua (qu:) Wikipedia not all Quechua variants can be allowed, but you cannot start a Wikipedia for each code within this macrolanguage. There is a Wikipedia request for w:Kichwa language, which has a unified orthography (Kichwa Unificado) but has no ISO code (variants within this language, do). —SPQRobin
- 2010-07-01 note about Western Punjabi (pnb): pnb: Wikipedia is written in the same language (Eastern Punjabi) as pa: Wikipedia, except the script is different. "pnb" is reserved for Western Punjabi. What should we do? There is also a new request for a Wiktionary and a Wikiquote in the same languages as pnb: Wikipedia . —SPQRobin
- Approving new projects. Millosh
Projects and plansEdit
- Webfont extension. Millosh
- Creating free fonts for languages which don't have them. Millosh Adding additional missing characters to fonts for Latin, Greek, Cyrillic. Creating free fonts for ancient scripts because already these are cited in articles. Evertype 18:28, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
- Creating written forms for languages which don't have them. Millosh This needs linguistic expertise as well as expertise in orthography design. There are not so many people in the world with such expertise. It also needs buy-in from a willing user community, hopefully one which is in a position to influence things back home. Evertype 18:28, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
- List of "missing Wikipedias": Create a list of languages which don't have Wikimedia projects. (Limit it on 100k or 10k speakers.) Millosh
- A report on "what is needed" to improve language availability and use throughout all the communities. Evertype