Talk:Learning and Evaluation/Case studies/Wikimania Esino Lario Survey Results
How about the report edit
Dear all, thanks for working on the survery. We also submitted a report to the Wikimedia Foundation we never got feedback from. can you please have a look? Wikimania 2016 bids/Esino Lario/Financial plan/Contract Wikimedia Foundation/Report. We submitted it in November and it still looks like it is "under review" and not approved. thanks, --iopensa (talk) 10:28, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
Wifi edit
There is something strange in the evaluation if i remember correctly the results of the survey: the evaluation of the wifi is different from the participants of the hackathon and the participants in general. I wonder if it is because wifi was not available in all the accommodation. Otherwise we would expect the participants of the hackathon to be unsatisfied with the wifi, which it is not the case if I recall it correctly. --iopensa (talk) 10:33, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
Number of participants edit
Where does the number "Conference participants: 806 attendees" comes from? I have checked also with Marta Pigazzini who took care of all registrations and the number of registrations we have is 1368. This is the number we used in our report. We have no document we produced and no email exchange in which the number 806 is provided by us or by the Wikimedia Foundation based on any kind of recording system. I presume it is just a mistake. --iopensa (talk) 10:32, 2 March 2017 (UTC)