Wikivoyage/Logo/2013/R1/c/Plane2.png

< Wikivoyage‎ | Logo‎ | 2013
Latest comment: 10 years ago by Effeietsanders in topic Comments
Wikivoyage Logo
Election 2013
Isatis78: Plane 2 - It looks like both an open book and an airplane. It invites to open, read and write.

Comments edit

The following conversation is taken from Wikivoyage/Logo 2013/Submissions#Option 3 - Plane 2:

It looks like both an open book and an airplane. It invites to open, read and write. --NaBUru38 (talk) 22:12, 11 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

I feel like you don't need to confine yourself to the Wikimedia shades. Was that your natural choice for both logos, or was it to reinforce brand identity? Qardys (talk) 23:22, 11 July 2013 (UTC)Reply
I remember this logo, and I really like the excellet idea that is behind it. Maybe (although I don't know how) I would graphically enforce these two concept, because without the explanation they don't arrive immediately. Once you know them, are clear, and are clear as well after several observation, but in my opinion a logo should be clear since the first glance. --Andyrom75 (talk) 07:26, 12 July 2013 (UTC)Reply
To me it looks like neither an open book nor an aircraft, even when I am told it should. I can see the attempted resemblance, but for me it just does not gel. That which makes it look somewhat like an aircraft, detracts from the book-like aspects and vice versa. · · · Peter (Southwood) (talk): 09:46, 12 July 2013 (UTC)Reply
I can see the book but no aircraft. Wikivoyage is not Wikibooks, I dont want confusion. --Pyfisch (talk) 10:09, 12 July 2013 (UTC)Reply
Great idea. It was my first choice during the first round already and it will be my first choice. Really like it. -- DerFussi 13:16, 12 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

I believe that this submission breaks the rules: it was created by User:Isatis78 while submitted by User:NaBUru38. //Shell 07:31, 13 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

User:Isatis78 has now confirmed agreement to the logo submission rules here. Restoring this one to discussion. I've retitled this section according to the creator's original title. --Maggie Dennis (WMF) (talk) 20:53, 14 July 2013 (UTC)Reply