Wikilawsuits
| Wikilawsuits | |
|---|---|
| no logo | |
| Status of the proposal | |
| Status | procedurally closed |
| Reason | still largely unintelligible |
| Details of the proposal | |
| Project description | open way to write declarations and track and upload documents for court publicly for topics that bother many people |
| Is it a multilingual wiki? | Will there be many language versions or just on one multilingual wiki? - i do not know |
| Potential number of languages | yes, multilingual |
| Proposed tagline | no tagline |
| Proposed URL | no website |
| Technical requirements | |
| New features to require | probably no new features are required |
| Development wiki | no |
| Interested participants | |
| List of project participants | |
Proposed by
Alternative names
wikilegalcases, wikiprocess, wikitrial, wikiproceedings, wikideclarations, wikiappeals, i do not know english well enough to know which of these are ok
Related projects/proposals
Domain names
wikilawsuits.org
Mailing list links
no foundation-l page
Proposal
open way to write declarations and track and upload documents for court publicly, and to link to relevant documents and other webpages, for topics that bother many people
this way, crowdsourcing, of writing of declaration for court, can be cheaper or trustworthier than help of jurist. as i know, there is special treatment of medical advices and legal advices in some of usa states, they are disallowed except if given by professionals, but, it is not the case in russia, and probably in many other countries. those domains of knowledge are just as other domains of knowledge, feel free to talk.
Demos
for example, i tried to write links about a russian lawsuit of a school principal against russia's government, as i remember: w:tt:Кулланучы:Qdinar/Павел_Шмаковның_татар_теле_дәресләре_буенча_судлашулары . i made a scheme of how many court sessions are related, in a linked page. this my activity is not fully allowed in wikipedia, by rules, but i thought, since that data can be used in articles, it can be considered as allowed. and nobody reprimanded me. also i would try and would like, in some time in future, to help to write, or get help in writing, a declaration about allowed languages of russia's school exams.
People interested
People opposed
Oppose still don’t understand what this is at all. Dronebogus (talk) 11:14, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
- i do not understand why you do not understand it. as i said, there are english words, which should be comprehensible each itself. you should be able to show at least a one point in the text which is incomprehensible, like several words used together and the meaning formed by them is not acceptable, because it contradicts some well known ideas, facts, or some other place of the text. so, please, explain, what cannot you understand here. to tell the truth, i have answered to this here only after one month, after he closed this my project again. i copied my previous answer as a quick reaction, but maybe i will try also to write additional explanations. --QDinar (talk) 21:37, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
- English is a language which requires the words to be assembled in a coherent and rational order to convey meaning. The rules are complex and flexible, but they do exist, and the descriptions above do not convey a useful meaning in their context. · · · Peter (Southwood) (talk): 04:44, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
- i do not understand why you do not understand it. as i said, there are english words, which should be comprehensible each itself. you should be able to show at least a one point in the text which is incomprehensible, like several words used together and the meaning formed by them is not acceptable, because it contradicts some well known ideas, facts, or some other place of the text. so, please, explain, what cannot you understand here. to tell the truth, i have answered to this here only after one month, after he closed this my project again. i copied my previous answer as a quick reaction, but maybe i will try also to write additional explanations. --QDinar (talk) 21:37, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose as I mentioned on RfD, the scope of this is not clear. --SHB2000 (talk | contribs) 06:17, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
- i do not understand. can you give some examples, what would you like to not be in scope of this. QDinar (talk) 05:53, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
- The explanation of the scope needs to come from the proposer. When the proposed scope is clear, then others can explain their opinions on what should and should not be included. ̴ · · · Peter (Southwood) (talk): 05:00, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
- i do not understand. can you give some examples, what would you like to not be in scope of this. QDinar (talk) 05:53, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
Comments
Not clear what the scope of the project would include, or how it would be used. Not possible to support without clarification. · · · Peter (Southwood) (talk): 04:44, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
- for example, for collective declarations for court to defend human rights of minority groups, in various countries. to write the declarations together, and if declaration is written again for an upper level of court, to track that process. --QDinar (talk) 12:09, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
- Still unclear. If you are not a native English speaker, I suggest you explain in you home language. Others can then try to translate in a way that could be clearer to the rest of us who are currently baffled. Cheers, · · · Peter (Southwood) (talk): 04:55, 12 January 2023 (UTC)