This is a proposal for a new Wikimedia sister project.
wikieducation
The logo for the project, if you already have one
Status of the proposal
Statusrejected
ReasonConsensus against a new project. * Pppery * it has begun 18:04, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Details of the proposal
Project descriptionThe aim of the project is to provide free lessons for Primary and Secondary education and will be according to the courses of each country. Teachers, students and those interested in the subject can contribute to the project. This will also help students around the world exchange experiences. it is like an international school open to all for free for every child to study.
Is it a multilingual wiki?Each country will have its own wiki.
Potential number of languagesThere can be multiple languages in one wiki or depending on the languages in which they are taught in each country's education system.
Proposed taglineDoes your project have a tagline? (optional)
Proposed URLcountrycode.wikieducation.org Ex:us.wikieducation.org
Technical requirements
New features to requireIf the project requires any new features that the MediaWiki software currently doesn't have, please describe in detail. Are additional MediaWiki extensions needed for the project?
Development wikiDoes your project have a technical-development wiki (e.g., in Wikimedia Labs)?
Interested participants
List of project participants


Proposed by edit

Alternative names edit

Related projects/proposals edit

Domain names edit

Mailing list links edit

Demos edit

People interested edit

Discussion edit

How is this different than Wikiversity? —Justin (koavf)TCM 08:40, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe it is like Wikiversity, but better. The problem of Wikiversity is that it is like an educational encyclopedia that includes lessons that are mostly general and unordered and do not follow a unified format, making it difficult to use. So I suggested the idea of creating a wiki dedicated to each country, so that it could focus on the country's educational programs. But if the idea is not right, I'm also not sure whether if it's right or not, it might be also better to rely on the existing one that already in place and improve it instead of creating a new one.--Mohamed.mdb (talk) 04:22, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Support This is a great idea. Tomybrz Bip Bip 07:22, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Oppose But being better doesn't change the fact that it's the same as an already existing wikiproject. ArepTicous talkcontribs 10:27, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]