User talk:Ijon/Content gap

17%

Thank you Ijon for this informative table. This directly relates to the fact of misrepresentation of women in history. See also here How 17 Equals 49.6: The Amazing Multiplying Women by How Stuff Works. Best regards, -- Golan's mom

I wish we could retroactively get rid of all catholic bishops and football players! Nemo 09:11, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

As a movement, we've never been one to shy away from difficult work. Thanks to Asaf for putting this togeter. I look forward to revisiting it in the future to see how much progress we've made. Ckoerner (talk) 14:02, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

Good to know, thank you all for compiling this set of data. So how to deal with it? a) Why is ne so different and can we learn from ne? b) in lists of wanted articles - how about listing women first until we reach an even match? --Polimorph (talk) 13:51, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

2021 2022 ?

Great page but maybe we could add the next years to have an idea of the evolution ? Natacha LSP (talk) 09:00, 31 January 2023 (UTC)

Hi, Natacha!

I haven't been maintaining this little page, because there are now more rigorous and better-maintained tools out there. Diversity data over time can be tracked in this tool by Marc. Asaf (WMF) (talk) 13:16, 31 January 2023 (UTC)

Hi @Asaf (WMF) the link you gave seem to be broken. Can you share it again ? Warm regards ! Natacha LSP (talk) 13:47, 16 February 2023 (UTC)

Hi, Natacha LSP. The link is correct; it is the tool that is currently broken. I have pinged @Marcmiquel about it, but so far, he has not responded. Asaf (WMF) (talk) 15:35, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

I wasn't aware the server was down. I believe it works again! :) Marcmiquel (talk) 16:26, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

Thanks, @Marcmiquel!

FYI, @Natacha LSP. Asaf (WMF) (talk) 10:06, 7 March 2023 (UTC)