OK Billinghurst, I understand. What is the difference between the other links linking to a plant and my link, linking to a pollinator? When I add something about the pollinators, then I still think that a picture is absolutely necessary, it gives a good view of the pollinator. So if I add information about the pollinators, how should I then add a photograph without having it removed again? I just think it is good to share the informations I gathered, that is why I started sharing it on Wikipedia. Is it possible to cancel all the removals of the links, then I can add some text in Wikipedia. This is easier for me, it cost a lot of work to add all the links on the pages. And as I understand it, with a accompanying text it is OK for you to add a link to a picture, is that correct? Thanks for answering and helping me, I am totally new on wikipedia. But learning ;-) Best wishes, Jean
- I think that it is best that you seek local assistance, and get some understanding from your local community about this process. In short this is about building better articles not necessarily linking off-site, this is not about links at any cost, it is about authoritative links and information remembering that this is an enyclopaedia, not a directory listing. From the encyclopaedia's point of view, the amount of work put into external sites is not and cannot be how or why we link to them, which reflects on the conflict of interest concept. Work with one community, understand our processes, develop your skills, before you even consider links cross-wiki. — billinghurst sDrewth 00:35, 3 March 2013 (UTC)