Arbeo~metawiki

Wikipedia in lingua lombarda

Ho letto le discussioni della pagina di creazione di wikipedia in lingua lombarda ma ho visto che le discussioni sono tutte del 2005 e mettendo l'encicolpedia in tale lingua mi compaiono solo voci in italiano. Vorrei sapere se il progetto è ancora attivo e come scrivere nell'enciclopedai in lingua lombarda la dove invece compare solo italiano. --Natoleone (talk) 10:50, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Native name of Cantonese

• Approved_requests_for_new_languages#Summary of approved requests

Native name: 粵語 [please confirm if correct -- Arbeo 17:55, 4 January 2006 (UTC)]

Yes, correct

HenryLi 07:15, 16 January 2006 (UTC)

Cebuano Wikibooks and Wikitionary

Hello, it seems these are already approved. Where could I find these? Thanks --Nino Gonzales 15:40, 19 January 2006 (UTC)

Ladinische Wikipedia

Hoi! Ich habe ladinischen (Grödner) Leuten über die ladinische Wikipedia gesprochen. Einige waren interessiert, sie sagen aber, dass sie viele Schwierigkeiten mit der Schriftsprache haben. Tschüs. Skafa.meta - Skafa.de - Skafa.it

Ladinische Wikipedia / Anmeldung

Hallo,

ich habe nun einige Freude beisammen, die interessiert wären die ladinische Wikipedia zu erweitern. Eine Frage, muss man bei der englischen Wikipedia einen Accout erstellen, wie kann man sich anmelden. Kann man nicht bei jeder Wikipedia mit dem gleichen Username einsteigen?

Danke

• Antwort

New Proposal

Hi Arbeo, when I proposed Portuñol Riverense, I mistakenly skipped the step of pasting it at the new proposal section of Request for new languages, and pasted it at the end of the article. Should I move the request there now? --Muñata 21:00, 27 April 2006 (UTC)

• respuesta

Serbska wikipedija (Sorbische Wikipedia)

Witaj Arbeo,

hab Dank fuer Deinen Hinweis auf meiner Diskussionsseite. Ich hab mich beim "request for new languages" mit "strong support" eingetragen. Schau mal nach, ob das so reicht, oder ob ich noch irgendwas anderes tun muss ... Wie du diesen Zeilen entnehmen kannst, bin ich kein grosser Wikipedia-Spezialist. Aber ich find die Chance fuer unser kleines Voelkchen einmalig und bemuehe mich nach Wissen und Gewissen in unserer sorbischen Wikipedia. Liebe Gruesse, --nepl 13:28, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

Zazaki

I'm confused; the proposal of Zazaki Wikipedia has been approved? Some users think that the proposal is aprroved. Please correct the confusion.--Taichi - (あ！) 01:07, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

Hi Arbeo, I asked to admin Steinbach (formerly Ceaserian) to move the request for Zazaki Wikipedia. He told that I could move it, and I did. --Maviulke12 05:03, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

• Alright then. Hope somebody will soon find the time to create the approved wikis. Good luck to you guys! --ARBE0 10:26, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

Hi again Arbeo, Node eu is erasing Zazaki Wikipedia request from the approved page. He seems to be very hateful agaist the project. We created a nice test-wikipedia and waited such a long time. Now, just one guy is trying to block our work. What should we do? --Maviulke12 02:53, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

Hi Maviulke! I guess the best thing to do now is remain calm. I just re-checked your request and it really seems to have a sufficient number of pros now, which is good. Staying cool-headed and factual even when somebody is provoking you and the other Zazaki editors is probably the best promotion for your project. 99% of all people here prefer to collaborate in a friendly and polite manner. If somebody wants to start a fight just refuse to take part because that's not what Wikipedia is about. In the long run, civilized and sober-headed people will always gain plenty of respect within the community and thus succeed, while cantankerous and self-centered individuals will discredit themselves in time due to their own behaviour. Regards, --ARBE0 13:01, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

Hi Arbeo, what Maviulke forgot to mention was the fact that he deleted votes. Please check the history of the Zazaki template. Before the votes he removed, it had 68% approval only. I decided to leave the issue alone since I was banned temporarily for reverting his vote deletions and since nobody else was backing me up, I figured I was alone in my disgust at such behaviour and that it was really pointless to try to stop such an effort.

In addition, I'd like to solicit a comment from you regarding Taichi's moving of the Old Church Slavonic and Old Norse requests to the Approved page. I disagree with his logic, given that neither request is supported by any fluent speakers, but according to him they can be moved because "sufficient interest" has been shown (see my talk page: user talk:Node ue). I have reverted his addition 3 times now and I hope that he will not add it again as I try to discuss the issue with him, but if he does, I will not revert it for at least a week in the hope that I may get supporting or opposing opinions from you and Caesarion. I do not think it's constructive to approve requests for Wikipedias that have absolutely no fluent speaker support, empty or nearly-empty test wikipedias, and whose original requesters have shown little interest, as it seems likely that if these Wikipedias were to be created, they would remain empty for an extended period of time, and also because it opens the door to creation of many other new Wikis with no support from native or fluent speakers, "just because we felt like it". --Node ue 15:24, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

Hi Node! Sorry for the late reply. I basically agree with you that ancient as well constructed languages should only be declared "approved" if there's a sufficient number of, say, proficient speakers willing to contribute (i. e. at least two of them, similar to the "two native speakers" rule for living natural languages). That's why I moved the Novial req. only after I had made sure there were at least two capable Novial speakers (cf. User talk:Nov ialiste and Talk:Requests for new languages#Approving the Novial Wikipedia). --ARBE0 14:41, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

Novial test wiki

Hi, although I'm the main contributor at least 2 other experienced Novialists have contributed also: BRG and Novialist (the latter a different person from me).

One other contributor appears to be an Esperantist who's been learning Novial.

Regards, Nov ialiste 16:39, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

Techwiki

Are you a member of the WikiTech mailing list? If so, could you request the creation of the approved language-wikis? Not that anything's too likely to happen... I requested a few weeks ago, but my email didn't go through (and it's probably got the wrong Buryat code in it). Tuf-Kat 01:45, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

Yeah, I know, there's not likely to be any results, but at least nobody can say we didn't follow the supposed procedure. Tuf-Kat 22:48, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

Baierisch nach "Approved"

Das finde ich mal sportlich von dir, Arbeo, du hast ja die Baierische Wikipedia nicht gewollt... Steinbach (formerly Caesarion) 14:08, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

Little problem

Hi, we have a little problem. User:Tugazo propose a European Portuguese Wikipedia, in the proposal of new languages, but much portuguese users vote oppose to the proposal. But, Tugazo annulated the resulted, because only the votes of the habitants of Portugal are valid, and restricted the votation. He sabotaged the votation, and maybe think that he will be gained a block for this action. --Taichi - (あ！) 04:38, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

Tugazo ha renunciado su propuesta, así que la borró. --Taichi - (あ！) 20:29, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

Ah, muy bien. Gracias por informarme. --ARBE0 12:17, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

Cambio

Hola. Pienso que la página Requests for new languages está muy desordenada y fea. ¿Qué opinas? Yo opino que deberían haber algunas reglas nuevas:

1. El proponente (proposer) debe ser usuario registrado en Meta y tener enlace a una (1) cuenta activa en otro proyecto Wikimedia (Wikipedia, Wiktionary, Wikibooks, etc.).
2. Los votos deben ser de usuarios registrados en Meta y tener enlace una (1) cuenta activa en otro proyecto Wikimedia (Wikipedia, Wiktionary, Wikibooks, etc.). No más IP's o usuarios extraños sin referencias.
3. La votación debe durar 2 meses (2 months)
4. El pedido (request) debe tener un 75% de apoyo (support) al cumplir los 2 meses, para que sea aceptado como nueva Wikipedia.
5. Si el pedido aprobado no tiene usuarios nativos, que el pedido vaye a la página No native speaker support
6. Si el pedido no tiene 1 voto de apoyo (0 vote support) en 1 mes, se niega (denied).

Si usamos estas reglas nuevas, tendremos orden. --Taichi - (あ！) 21:53, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

Hola Taichi. En breve:

1. Estoy de acuerdo.

2. Buena idea. Así las votaciones serían mas transparentes y justas.

3. Si, o podemos decir "2 meses como máximo" (si hay un resultado positivo obvio antes no hay que esperar tanto).

4. Si, como ahora.

5. Claro, pero me gustaría más pedir a los usarios solamente hacer un pedido para una nueva Wikipedia cuando saben la lengua. Los pedidos hechos por "non-native speakers" ("he escuchado algo sobre la lengua xyz...") normalmente no sirven para nada y congestionan la página.

6. de acuerdo.

Saludos, --ARBE0 16:11, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

Gratitude

Thanks for support of our language section in the Sakha language.--HalanTul 21:54, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

• You're welcome! I hope it helps and you can soon start working on a "real" wiki. Regards, --ARBE0 16:59, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

Hey: Wikipedia Rotuman

Noticed ur good work in an archived discussion about some Polynesian WP requests that were knocked back (rightly so, no idea wat that Belgian man user was up to!). I'd like to respectfully invited you to vote for Wikipedia Rotuman here. Thanks heaps. Matt Bray

• Done. Good luck! --ARBE0 10:14, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

• Thanks for your valuable support --Mattbray 13:08, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

New language

Hallo, I noticed User:Arbeo/New Languages Check-Up, maybe you are interested in incubator:SCL? That's a list of all new wikis :) SPQRobin ^(inc!) 12:23, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed

Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Arbeo. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Arbeo~metawiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation

03:31, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed

This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: Special:GlobalRenameRequest. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk)

19:53, 21 April 2015 (UTC)