Talk:Wikimedia Conference 2016/Program Design Process/Track: How to move forward

How to recover from this crisis edit

Designate a recovery team edit

The leadership team currently has the following members: Maggie Dennis (Community Engagement), Katherine Maher (Communications), Jaime Villagomez (Finance), Lisa Seitz Gruwell (Advancement), Geoff Brigham (Legal), Wes Moran (Product/Technology), and Joady Lohr (HR).

Criticize the Movement strategy 2010-2015 edit

Determine the context of this crisis edit

Expect more from the Board of Trustees edit

Get everyone on board edit

Make an action plan edit

Maintain external communications edit

11-03-2016, Katherine Maher appointed as interim executive director for the Wikimedia Foundation, Juliet Barbara, Wikimedia blog
11-03-2016, Wikimedia Foundation executive transition update, Patricio Lorente, wikimedia-l
04-03-2016, Executive transition planning, Alice Wiegand, wikimedia-l
25-02-2016, Thank you for our time together, Lila Tretikov, wikimedia-l

Communicate clearly and often edit

Keep the servers running edit

Keep the users editing edit

Create a great change story edit

Build traction for change with quick wins edit

Replace a top-team member - or two edit

Find a retain talented people edit

Suggestion for a slightly enhanced process edit

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Many thanks for devoting an entire track to this.

From the page:

"use this opportunity to jointly figure out how we want to move forward as a network of partners. The conference is the ideal platform to discuss and find answers to questions like the following. We would first like to collect all open questions here and, in a next step, cluster them and create session descriptions including goals, preparation needs and next steps."

Please consider the following modified version:

Answer these questions online, with the entire community, in advance of the meeting. Including defining goals, needs, and possible next steps.

Use the conference as a place to build alignment, understanding, agreement, and trust around answers to these questions. Spend time together discussing any significant difference in opinion that have already been discovered through the online discussion

Have followups online, with all who participated. (people having had meaningful participation here will also make them more inclined to engage in the next steps)

Warmly, –SJ talk 16:01, 21 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Add topic