Talk:Requests for comment/Chapters. Proposal to give transparency and voice to the communities

There are several comments supposing bad fait in the proposal because of its wording. I would be happy to hear other wordings to find the way to get transparency and to hear the voice of the communities in the chapter’s approval and renewal process. Those ideas together with other thoughts have been in movement roles talk page for more than one month and nobody has expressed any proposal to improve the wording.--Gomà 16:03, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

Following Litlok suggestion I have reworded the "against side" to: "Against this way to get transparency and give voice to the communities" and added "Other proposals to get transparency and give voice to the communities" --Gomà 16:13, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

Notice for closing the RfC

Hi, this RfC has been open for a couple of years now, with no new comment. I am going to close it soon. Theo10011 03:04, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

I agree. The requirements of this proposal are included in a broader set to be approved soon by the WMF Board as Accountability standards.--Gomà 08:51, 13 February 2012 (UTC)