Wikimedia Meta-Wiki

Stewards/elections 2009/statements/Gutza

< Stewards | elections 2009 | statements

Gutza

edit

translate: translation help, statement, template, headings

This candidate has withdrawn.
I apologise for wasting everybody's time with this. The timing was off for me, I left on vacation with the family as this process was taking place, and so I couldn't invest enough time in following up; I thought I could be more active while on vacation, but that didn't happen. Also, I did indeed fail to notice this process was meant to recruit active stewards exclusively, hence my naïve statement – I shouldn't have applied in the first place. I want to apologise in particular to the people who took the time to translate my statement, and in general to everybody who invested time in voting and/or asking questions. --Gutza 19:55, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
English:
  • Languages: ro, en-3, fr-1
  • Personal info: former Arb-com and developer; current admin on en.wiki, checkuser, bureaucrat and admin on ro.wiki, OTRS volunteer. I do not expect to be a truly active steward, I'm only applying for this status because that might occasionally dilute the other stewards' workload somewhat.
Deutsch:
  • Sprachen: ro, en-3, fr-1
  • Informationen zur Person: ehemaliger Schiedsrichter und Entwickler; momentan Administrator auf en.wiki, Checkuser, Bürokrat und Administrator auf ro.wiki, OTRS-Mitarbeiter. Ich gehe nicht davon aus, ein wirklich aktiver Steward zu sein; ich melde mich nur für diesen Status, weil das möglicherweise den Arbeitsauwand der anderen Stewards etwas verringern könnte.
français:
  • Langues: ro, en-3, fr-1
  • Renseignements personnels: ancien membre du comité d'arbitrage et développeur ; actuellement administrateur sur en.wiki, vérificateur d'adresse IP, bureaucrate et administrateur sur ro.wiki, volontaire OTRS. Je ne m'attends pas à être un steward réellement actif, je candidate à ce statut uniquement parce que cela pourrait occasionnellement diminuer quelque peu la charge de travail des autres stewards.
日本語:
  • 言語: ro, en-3, fr-1
  • 候補者の情報: 元裁定委員で開発者です。現在英語版ウィキペディアで管理者を、ルーマニア語版ウィキペディアでチェックユーザー係、ビューロクラットおよび管理者をしており、OTRSにも関わっています。高頻度での活動は難しいかもしれませんが、スチュワードとなることでほかのスチュワードの負担を少しでも減らすことができればと考え、この権限を申請します。
română:
  • Languages (translate this): ro, en-3, fr-1
  • Despre mine: fost membru în comitetul de arbitrare şi dezvoltator; actual administrator la en.wiki, checkuser, birocrat şi administrator la ro.wiki, voluntar OTRS. Nu mă aştept să fiu un steward cu adevărat activ, fac această cerere doar cu speranţa că ar putea ameliora într-o oarecare măsură numărul de cereri alocate celorlalţi stewarzi.
italiano:
  • Lingue: ro, en-3, fr-1
  • Informazioni personali: Fondatore e sviluppatore Arbitration Committee, attualmente amministratore di en.wiki; checkuser, burocrate e amministratore su ro.wiki e volontario OTRS. Non mi aspetto di essere uno stewart veramente attivo, voglio solo ottenere questa carica perchè essa mi può permettere di diluire il carico di lavoro degli altri steward.
polski:
  • Języki: ro, en-3, fr-1
  • Informacje osobiste: były członek komitetu Arbitrażowego i developer, aktualny admin na en.wiki, checkuser, biurokrata i admin na ro.wiki, ochotnik OTRS. Nie spodziewam się być bardzo aktywnym stewardem, Kandyduduję do tej funkcji jedynie by czasami odciązyć innych stewardów.
português:
  • Línguas: ro, en-3, fr-1
  • Informações pessoais: antigo Arb-com e desenvolvedor; atual administrador na en.wiki, verificador, burocrata e administrador na ro.wiki, voluntário OTRS. Eu não espero ser um steward realmente ativo, apenas aplicaria este estatuto para ocasionalmente diluir o trabalho dos outros stwards.
русский:
  • Языки: ro, en-3, fr-1
  • Личная информация: бывший член Арбитражного комитета и разработчик; нынче администратор en.wiki, чекюзер, бюрократ и администратор ro.wiki, волонтёр в OTRS. Я не собираюсь быть действительно активным стюардом, я хочу получить этот статус лишь потому, что это, возможно, немного снимет нагрузку с других стюардов.
中文（简体）:
  • 可说语言: ro, en-3, fr-1
  • 个人资料: 原裁定委员及开发人员。现在为英语版维基管理员，也在罗马尼亚语版管理担任用户检查员、行政官员、管理员，以及OTRS志工人员。个人不敢期望能成为一位真正地活跃的监管员。我来申请这个职位由于、或许在某些程度上我能够有时候减轻其他监管人员的负担。
中文（繁體）:
  • 可說語言: ro, en-3, fr-1
  • 個人資料: 原裁定委員及開發人員。現在為英語版維基管理員，也在羅馬尼亞語版維基擔任用戶檢查員、行政官員、管理員，以及OTRS志工人員。個人不敢期望能成為一位真正地活躍的監管員。我來申請這個職位由於、或許在某些程度上我能夠有時候減輕其他監管人員的負擔。


  Questions → Stewards/elections 2009/Questions

  Yes

edit
  1.   Yes Intelectual, gentleman, responsable, intelligent, tactful, very active (workoholic), very efficient. Alex F. 11:52, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
  2. Avjoska 06:40, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  3. A responable and trustworthy user. Firilăcroco discuție / talk 07:55, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  4. --Istvánka 10:40, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    A very responsable user. And what's up if he's not very active? You all haven't a personal life?What the hell? TibyLicio.Us Sprechen Sie! Not eligible to vote. Tomasz W. Kozłowski 16:53, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  5. --P@d@w@ne 09:05, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Szalakóta 14:48, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  7.   Support HBR 23:53, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  8.   Support Romihaitza 09:16, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Support - Amgine/meta wikt wnews blog wmf-blog goog news 21:24, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  10.   Support --Vlad 20:10, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  11.   Support --Arie Inbar 06:37, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  No

edit
  1. — Aitias // discussion 00:02, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  2. --Thogo (talk) 00:06, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  3. I stopped reading when I saw "I do not expect to be a truly active steward". We have enough of those already, no thanks. Majorly talk 00:08, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Imho not a serious candidate, we need active stewards, sorry, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 00:09, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  5. No. Not going to be active. Razorflame 00:14, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  6. no. Micha L. Rieser 00:35, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  7. --Seha 00:37, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Az1568 (talk) 00:38, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  9. We need active stewards. Herr Kriss 00:44, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  10. No/いいえ. --Taichi - (あ！) 01:03, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  11. --Ivan Štambuk 01:04, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  12. No. We need very active stewards. Stwardship is not a tool or statussymbol! Romaine 01:10, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  13. You want to work as a steward - or not. There's nothing between. Marcus Cyron 01:16, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  14. No. macy 01:20, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Clearly doesn't understand what being a steward is or what would qualify one to do the job. This is so obvious, I'm not sure this is a serious request.  — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 01:22, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  16.   Oppose — neuro(talk) 01:28, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  17. --FollowTheMedia 01:29, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Sorry~~ --Alexpaintartist 04:19, 1 February 2009 (UTC) Not eligible to vote. Tomasz W. Kozłowski 16:55, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Prodego talk 04:43, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  19. --Sir James 06:14, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Achates 07:23, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  21. --Brownout(msg) 10:01, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Nu, per statement. Jon Harald Søby 10:36, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Efbé   10:40, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Fruggo 10:42, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  25.   Oppose Vyk 11:26, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  26.   Oppose Per I do not expect to be a truly active steward - we need more active stewards. The Helpful One 12:14, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  27. —Dferg (meta-w:es:) 14:23, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  28. --MF-W 14:28, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Obelix 15:14, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Oppose, due to intent of inactivity. -- Nahum 15:15, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Points for honesty, but not intending to be active in the role makes your candidacy a non-starter for me. Rje 16:08, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Sorry, but active stewards are needed. Enbéká 16:17, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Looks like the candidate did not appear even to answer the questions, so he really seems to be not a truly active steward — NickK 19:23, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  34. NonvocalScream 20:57, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  35. --Uwe Gille 09:43, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  36. we need active ones --FiliP × 12:25, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  37. GlassCobra 15:06, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  38.   Oppose — MrDolomite • Talk 15:18, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  39.   Contra. QuartierLatin1968 20:46, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  40. --Davecrosby uk 00:36, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Mailer Diablo 03:59, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  42. per Majorly. Alex Pereira falaê 12:28, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Tiptoety talk 20:54, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  44. --ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 21:53, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  45.   Oppose He didn't understand the meaning of Wikipedia/Wikimedia/Bureaucrat/Steward. He's just trouble. :-( --Pixi 07:28, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  46. John Vandenberg 17:18, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  Neutral

edit
  1. too honest to give a no :-) --Revolus Echo der Stille 04:04, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  2. ...Aurora... 11:36, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  3. nothing against him but not a good motivation for me --Gdgourou 10:27, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stewards/elections_2009/statements/Gutza&oldid=26366942"