Stewards/confirm/2009/Wpedzich

< Stewards‎ | confirm‎ | 2009
Warning The 2009 steward elections are finished. No further votes will be accepted.

WpedzichEdit

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights, crosswiki | translate: translation help, statement

English:
  • Languages: pl, en-4, de-2
  • Personal info: I try to be around in order to help in some "critical" situations. Perhaps not always following the requests page, I am usually reachable via IRC and therefore can react "on sight".
português:
  • Línguas: pl, en-4, de-2
  • Informações pessoais: Tento estar a postos para ajudar nas situações mais críticas. Talvez não esteja sempre seguindo a página de requisições, estou normalmente disponível via IRC e por conseguinte, posso reagir "à vista".
русский:
  • Языки: pl, en-4, de-2
  • Личная информация: Я стараюсь быть поблизости, чтобы помогать в "критических" ситуациях. Возможно, я не всегда реагирую на страницу запросов, но я всегда доступен в IRC, и потому могу реагировать "прицельно".


Comments about WpedzichEdit

  • Could be a little more active, but I'm happy here. Majorly talk 00:49, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  • You are always available and helpful. Thank you. --Thogo (talk) 01:38, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Helpful, and fairly, though not very active. Keep Wpedzich. Prodego talk 03:51, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Per the above 3, and my own interactions. ++Lar: t/c 04:39, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Per Thogo. Thank you wpedzich!!--Nick1915 - all you want 13:47, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Thank you for your work. Keepvvv 14:41, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Keep per Thogo —Dferg (meta-w:es:) 16:10, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Keep. -- Mercy (|) 16:46, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Keep wped --Fabexplosive The archive man 10:20, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Also one of my beloved steward buddies, very nice, always available. Thanks for your work! Regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 12:44, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Strongly Remove Weakly oppose [1] he should not have done.--Kwj2772 13:19, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
    I'm sorry, I'm not sure why that's inappropriate. Perhaps I'm missing something obvious...  — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 22:57, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
    At that time, 정안영민, a bureaucrat on kowp was active. he processed usurpation request on September 16, 2008, same date of wpedzich processed renaming request. In kowp, Using official requestboard is desirable. because we didn't have consensus at time, 정안영민 often deferred processing. 정안영민 stated on ko:위키백과토론:계정 이름 변경 요청 "제가 계속 계정명 변경 신청을 받고는 있습니다만, 명시된 기준도 없이 제 마음대로 처리하려니 고민이 많습니다." (I'm receiving rename request, but I'm agonied to process at my convenience because we have no clear rule.) but in this case, we didn't receive official request but private request. I think this happening was undesirable.--Kwj2772 23:54, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
    I agree that he should not have renamed, but IMHO this is not a reason to remove him as steward, please have a look at this huge rename requests from only one user. He had been advised several times before not to use different names on each wiki, but he did not listen, when sul was introduced he changed his mind and asked for these massive number of accounts. The user was quite present in the IRC channels and while the request was on wiki anyway he pinged several people to get his requst done, and obviously Wpedzich did not check for local bureaucrat activity or clicked the wrong line. I don't think he should be removed for that, but it should be a constructive critc. Imho his other work as a steward is good and I would plead for confirm, best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 01:41, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
    Thank you both for explaining this situation to me. I agree with Spacebirdy here - this is a mistake which should be avoided in the future, but not a reason to remove from stewardship.  — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 06:24, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
A lesson to be learnt for sure - I had a feeling the name changes were being waited on long enough, and the local bureaucrats, although existent, were hard to reach in my opinion, therefore my decision. As I said, a lesson for me. Thanks for the criticism. Wojciech Pędzich Talk 10:23, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
  •   Support --oscar 22:49, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
  •   Support.--Jusjih 03:15, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Useful fellow :) DarkoNeko 21:32, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
  •   Support ---Zyephyrus 23:05, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
  •   Support MBisanz talk 04:27, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
  •   Support satisfied with this steward, keep up the good work! fr33kman t - c 04:38, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
  •   Mantem, per above. Alex Pereira falaê 16:24, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
  •   Tak Kylu 21:17, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
  •   Support Mikhailov Kusserow (talk) 04:06, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
  •   Support good steward. --Aphaia 00:41, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Confirm --Meno25 17:07, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
  •   Support Active steward. --Millosh 13:35, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
  •   Keep Sebleouf 22:06, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
  • keep --FiliP × 17:52, 21 February 2009 (UTC)