- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
The proposal is to reopen the Simple English Wikiquote.
- See also: Proposals for closing projects/Closure of Simple English Wikiquote (3)
- Several concerns - the points of the previous request for closing projects still stand, and the Simple English Wikipedia community has decided they cannot support another Simple English project. hiàn 03:45, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
- @Hiàn: I suggest you to use en-simple instead of simple, see reason at phab:T110190. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 11:53, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
- Ah. Thank you for bringing that up. hiàn 18:28, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
Strong support --Assoc (talk) 11:57, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose I would say that that project is dead, it used to be just a sandbox of quotes, which is ok to use Wikiquote Beta Cluster instead now. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 12:43, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
- Quickly close this. --Artix Kreiger (Message Wall) 05:18, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
* Strong support 强烈支持吧！ --Fanjiayi (talk) 02:09, 9 February 2018 (UTC)troll comment. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 14:58, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
- Strong oppose No more so-called "Simple" projects. This does not meet the requirements §2 and §3 of the policy: The language must have a valid ISO 639 1–3 code, but this uses English code because it's English and does not have an own code, and The language must be sufficiently unique that it could not coexist on a more general wiki. In most cases, this excludes regional dialects and different written forms of the same language, and this thing called "Simple English" is no more than a different written form of the same language called English. --Zerabat (discusión) 14:27, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose - We should have a simplebooks, simpleversity, simplevoyage, and simplenews to go with our simplepedia and simpletionary, but simplequote is too far. KATMAKROFAN (talk) 01:09, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
The current policy makes it extremely difficult to create new simple projects. If someone has a true interest in doing something like this, there are some options available:
For LangCom: StevenJ81 (talk) 17:35, 27 April 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.