Requests for new languages/Wikipedia South African English
submitted | verification | final decision |
|
This proposal has been rejected. This decision was taken by the language committee in accordance with the Language proposal policy based on the discussion on this page. A committee member provided the following comment: The language must be sufficiently unique that it could not coexist on a more general wiki. In most cases, this excludes regional dialects and different written forms of the same language.
|
- The community needs to develop an active test project; it must remain active until approval (automated statistics, recent changes). It is generally considered active if the analysis lists at least three active, not-grayed-out editors listed in the sections for the previous few months.
- The community needs to complete required MediaWiki interface translations in that language (about localization, translatewiki, check completion).
- The community needs to discuss and complete the settings table below:
What | Value | Example / Explanation |
---|
Proposal | ||
---|---|---|
Language code | en-ZA (SIL, Glottolog) | A valid ISO 639-1 or 639-3 language code, like "fr", "de", "nso", ... |
Language name | South African English | Language name in English |
Language name | English | Language name in your language. This will appear in the language list on Special:Preferences, in the interwiki sidebar on other wikis, ... |
Language Wikidata item | Q1156228 - item has currently the following values:
|
Item about the language at Wikidata. It would normally include the Wikimedia language code, name of the language, etc. Please complete at Wikidata if needed. |
Directionality | LTR | Is the language written from left to right (LTR) or from right to left (RTL)? |
Site URL | en-za.wikipedia.org | langcode.wikiproject.org |
Settings | ||
---|---|---|
Project name | Wikipedia | "Wikipedia" in your language |
Project namespace | South African English Wikipedia | usually the same as the project name |
Project talk namespace | Wikipedia talk | "Wikipedia talk" (the discussion namespace of the project namespace) |
Enable uploads | yes | Default is "no". Preferably, files should be uploaded to Commons. If you want, you can enable local file uploading, either by any user ("yes") or by administrators only ("admin").
Notes: (1) This setting can be changed afterwards. The setting can only be "yes" or "admin" at approval if the test creates an Exemption Doctrine Policy (EDP) first. (2) Files on Commons can be used on all Wikis. (3) Uploading fair-use images is not allowed on Commons (more info). (4) Localisation to your language may be insufficient on Commons. |
Optional settings | ||
Project logo | [[:]] | This needs to be an SVG image (instructions for logo creation). |
Default project timezone | South African time zone | "Continent/City", e.g. "Europe/Brussels" or "America/Mexico City" (see list of valid timezones) |
Additional namespaces | For example, a Wikisource would need "Page", "Page talk", "Index", "Index talk", "Author", "Author talk". | |
Additional settings | Anything else that should be set | |
Proposal
editThe people of south Africa, matriculants & ordinary people are craving for free knowledge. They crave for an encyclopidia in the south African English. Not everyone is able to read and/or write in simple or complex English. Harley Quinn on duty (talk) 11:42, 6 December 2023 (UTC) Merged from another duplicated request: We as South Africans sometimes struggle to understand the terms and fusions they use in Normal English. We are used to using our own English. South African English is a mixture of South African culture and traditions. I understand that there is already a Simple English Wikipedia but that's not good enough. You can never find the meaning of haibo there. And even if you make an article about "haibo", by far the most spoken word in SA, the article will be deleted in less than 2 hours. So with that being said I believe that it is better for us south Africans to have our own Wikipedia and even if you are not South African, you can still join and learn our South African ways!!!! The girl kay (talk) 05:36, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
Discussion
edit- There is already a Wikipedia in English. No need for this. --Caro de Segeda (talk) 15:05, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
- That's what you think The girl kay (talk) 09:51, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
- South African English is not a language. It’s mutually intelligible with all other forms of standard English. Dronebogus (talk) 00:25, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose for this reason. --SHB2000 (t • c) 06:00, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- Close a.s.a.p., since South African English is no doubt mutually intelligible with, say, British English and currently each dialect of English does not have its edition of Wikipedia or any other Wikimedia project.--RekishiEJ (talk) 09:13, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- With all due respect but it's easy for you to say because you are not from south Africa. Think about the fact that people from south Africa struggle to understand normal English The girl kay (talk) 09:44, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
- https://www.gov.za/services-residents is a bunch of pages written by South Africans, for South Africans. To find differences from US English, I'd have to dig; it's certainly not a whole different language.--Prosfilaes (talk) 23:02, 25 October 2024 (UTC)
- With all due respect but it's easy for you to say because you are not from south Africa. Think about the fact that people from south Africa struggle to understand normal English The girl kay (talk) 09:44, 20 October 2024 (UTC)