- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
Second most spoken language in England.
Geordie has no ISO code, so no Wikipedia can be created. Additionally, it is usually considered to be just a dialect of English. However, there is a Scots Wikipedia... which has an ISO code. PiRSquared17 (talk) 00:24, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
The proposal's aime is to the cover broad northumbrian dialects and not particularly geordie, the reason why it's being called georgie by English speakers is unknown. BTW It DOES actually has an ISO, though it's a reletevly new one: 52-ABA-ab --Eitanish (talk) 00:35, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
- Sorry for saying "Geordie". That's a Linguasphere code, not an ISO 639 one. Example ISO 639 codes: en, sco, fr, de. We require ISO 639, not Linguasphere codes like 52-ABA-* for English dialects. Sorry. PiRSquared17 (talk) 15:57, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
Think it would be nice to have a wikpedia in Pitmatic? --188.8.131.52 15:12, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
- It might be nice but it appears that Pitmatic does not have an ISO code. Also see PiRSquared17's comment above. --Glaisher [talk] 15:40, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
- Isn't this just a dialect? PiRSquared17 (talk) 15:57, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
- Weak support - Yes, I would like to see this written, but not just as a collection of crap jokes, and using the full range of this dialect.-MacRusgail (talk) 23:03, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
- The problem is iso639-3:nth does not exist, so if still needed then some experts should request a code. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 22:21, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose No ISO code, no project. --184.108.40.206 08:30, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose Not convinced it's sufficiently distinct from English. Also, with reference to other proposals, are there standard grammar books and dictionaries? Is it taught as a "language" at any school? —DIV (220.127.116.11 07:36, 11 February 2019 (UTC))
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.