운동 헌장/자주 묻는 질문
운동 헌장에 대한 자주 묻는 질문 목록입니다. 답변은 운동 헌장 초안 위원회(아래의 많은 답변에서 “우리”라고 함)에서 나옵니다.
운동 헌장에 대하여
운동 헌장이란 무엇입니까?
- 운동 헌장은 위키미디어 운동의 모든 사람 사이의 책임과 관계를 명확히 하는 문서입니다. 또한 새로운 구조와 새로운 결정(예: 허브)을 구현하게 됩니다.
운동 헌장이 필요한 이유는 무엇입니까?
위키미디어 운동이 시작된 이후로 연결된 모든 프로젝트와 책임이 유기적으로 성장했습니다. 운동 헌장의 개발은 이 거버넌스 모델을 검토하기 위한 것이며, 최종 헌장은 운동이 계속 정렬되도록 하기 위한 표준 지침과 프로세스를 제공할 것입니다. 헌장은 2030 전략 권고안을 이행하는 데 필수적인 문서가 될 것이기 때문에 중요합니다. 그것이 적어도 향후 10년 동안 위키미디어 운동에 필요한 방향과 밀접하게 일치해야 하는 이유입니다.
운동 헌장은 커뮤니티에 어떤 영향을 미칩니까?
- 운동 헌장은 운동을 뒤집을 가능성이 있습니다. 기술 개선, 보조금, 자금 조달 등을 포함하여 특정 주제를 결정하거나 결정하지 않는 사람을 변경할 수 있습니다. 이것이 우리가 운동의 거버넌스에서 변경해야 할 사항에 대해 우리(운동 헌장 초안 작성 위원회)에 알려주도록 초대하는 이유입니다. 또한 당신이 만족하고 변하지 말아야 할 것들에 대해서도 말입니다.
What is the origin story of the Movement Charter Drafting Committee?
The Movement Charter was originally envisioned to be written by an “Interim Global Council” (IGC). This proposed Council would have helped reform Wikimedia movement governance by performing three main tasks: 1. Creating the Movement Charter, 2. Setting up the Global Council, and 3. Overseeing the implementation of Movement Strategy. However, this would require quite a lot of resources and discussions to set up. To resolve this situation, a group of Wikimedians proposed starting with the Movement Charter to move the governance reform forward. The proposal effectively replaced the IGC with the Movement Charter Drafting Committee, the election and selection process for which was held in late 2021.
Development and communication processes
How do you write the Movement Charter drafts, from the beginning until its publication for community review?
The Movement Charter consists of many sections. We decided to divide into smaller working groups to draft each section. The initial drafts are derived from group discussions, research and experience. Those drafts are reviewed internally with the Drafting Committee and iterated until the full committee deems the drafts to be “good enough” to be consulted on by the community. (“Good enough” means there is enough content for the community to discuss and offer feedback on.) Once we meet that threshold, the drafts go through legal and legibility reviews, after which we update again. Finally, it is shared to be translated and published for community review.
The drafts we share for community review is by no means final; we want your feedback to help improve it. Tell us what you like and don’t like, and why you feel that way. Propose alternative options for us to consider. Share other interesting and credible research for us to review.
How do you ensure the Movement Charter drafts are available in the languages of the Wikimedia movement?
The Movement Charter is being drafted primarily in English. Before the English text is finalized, we will review each draft chapter text to ensure that it is readable and translatable, in order to accommodate the need and desire to translate it as simply and straight-forwardly as possible. All drafts will be translated from English to at least the following priority languages: Arabic, Chinese, Brazilian Portuguese, French, German, Hindi, Indonesian, Russian, Spanish, and Ukrainian. We selected those languages to cover the majority of community members. At the end of the process (which is when we have a full draft Charter), we will explore the possibility of having certified translations in these prioritized languages. Following the customary practice of internationally-enforceable contracts and treaties, a certain language will usually “take precedence” over other languages in the event of any differences in meaning. For the Charter, we anticipate that English will take that precedence over translations in other languages.
운동 헌장에 대한 독립적인(위키미디어 재단이 아닌) 법적 검토가 있을 예정입니까?
We have resolved for some draft chapters of the Movement Charter to undergo legal reviews, both internally from the Wikimedia Foundation’s Legal department and externally from a global law firm. The external legal review is done by a reputable multinational law firm, which provide the service pro bono. When we have a full version of the Movement Charter, the internal and external legal review rounds will be done once again.
Why do the Movement Charter drafts need to undergo legal review?
The Movement Charter process aims to, among other things, decentralize and “share” powers that currently rests with the Wikimedia Foundation to other entities within the Wikimedia movement, where possible. However, some of these powers are linked (sometimes intrinsically) to the more existential features of the Foundation as a non-profit registered in the U.S. state of Florida. Both the internal and external legal reviews of the Movement Charter drafts are done to ensure that the Foundation will be able to support the eventual implementation of the Charter’s provisions and fulfill the mandate to decentralize its powers, while ensuring that as a legal entity with certain fiduciary responsibilities and obligations, the Foundation is not in breach of the laws and regulations of the United States and the state of Florida.
운동 헌장에 대한 업데이트는 어떻게 전달됩니까?
- 운동 헌장 초안 위원회와 운동 전략 및 거버넌스 팀은 상세한 커뮤니케이션 계획을 가지고 있습니다. 돌아오는 커뮤니케이션에는 월간 업데이트, 월간 뉴스레터 배포 및 캐주얼 업데이트가 포함됩니다. 커뮤니케이션은 운동의 각 이해 관계자와 원하는 참여 수준에 맞게 특별히 조정되었습니다(자세한 내용은 아래 참조).
운동 헌장 초안 작성 위원회는 메시지와 피드백에 어떻게 응답합니까?
We have a communications plan that distinguishes between four different levels of communication: informing (one way from the MCDC side), consulting, involving and collaborating. All the feedback received during the community conversations on various platforms of engagement and in different languages, such as Meta talk pages, Telegram channels, local on wiki conversations as well as community conversation hours, is carefully documented and handed over to the MCDC. MCDC will review all the feedback received, the supporting team will share a community consultation report in October, 2023.
Community conversations and engagement
운동 헌장에 대해 커뮤니티와 어떻게 상의할 것인가?
We want to continuously listen to all the community feedback while we draft the Movement Charter. We have completed a conversation round for the first three draft chapters in November-December 2022 and another feedback cycle about the proposed ratification methodology in April 2023. The timeline is dynamic, so if we need more conversations from the Wikimedia movement, we will schedule more rounds. During these conversations, the support staff and the Movement Charter Ambassadors will reach out to the Wikimedia project communities, affiliates, and other entities. They will be able to provide feedback through various channels, such as the Wikimedia project talk pages, live call sessions, anonymous survey, or at the multilingual Movement Strategy Forum. You can monitor ongoing conversations at its Meta page.
What are the results from the previous rounds of community conversations about the Movement Charter?
For the first three draft chapters (Preamble, Values & Principles, and Roles and Responsibilities) that were the focus of the November-December 2022 conversations, you can read the consultation summary and responses to the feedback from us, the Drafting Committee. The chapters have been updated accordingly in May 2023 (and later in August 2023, for the Roles and Responsibilites draft chapter). For the proposed ratification methodology, we are still working to integrate all the feedback received and make decisions regarding the methodology; in the meantime, you can read the consultation summary.
How are you managing all the feedback that you receive?
We intend to follow up on the open points we receive in the live community consultations, to the emails we receive, and to the questions raised on the Meta talk page, in the Movement Strategy Telegram channel and at the Movement Strategy Forum. Considering the multiple channels we are watching, this may mean we will collect the questions and create a summarized response later.
비영어권 커뮤니티의 피드백을 어떻게 고려할 것입니까?
It is vital that we receive feedback from speakers of different languages and communities. With the help of the support staff and Movement Charter Ambassadors, we strive to ensure that all feedback, regardless of the language, is carefully considered and taken into account by the MCDC.
Are you accepting feedback from outside of the community conversations period?
Yes, we value feedback from the communities at all times, not just during the designated community conversations period. While there is a general plan on the level of outreach that would suit a certain stakeholder, this does not always correspond to what the stakeholder themselves perceive, since they might possess knowledge or experience that we are not aware of. Therefore, it is important that stakeholders who themselves would like to participate also feel free to express their opinions unsolicited, at any time they wish to do so. You can do so by emailing us at movementcharter@wikimedia.org.
What is the current plan for community conversations?
The third round of community conversations will center around the Global Council, Hubs, and Roles and Responsibilities draft chapters, which are being shared separately throughout July and August 2023 but will form a single conversation round. The decision to stagger the release date of these draft chapters was taken to allow our stakeholders more time to understand and analyze them, and in order to conserve our community members “bandwidth” to meaningfully discuss them, especially with August 2023 being the month of the hybrid Wikimania edition. We also plan to share the draft of the Charter’s Glossary, which defines and explains several terms that are used throughout the document. We will be accepting feedback for this round until 1 September 2023.
As for the remaining draft chapter, Decision-making, we are currently making decisions on when is the best time to launch it, with a view that its release should not be far too long from the chapters released in July 2023.
I am an individual contributor to a Wikipedia project or its sister projects. How can I be involved in community conversations?
We realize that the Movement Charter process is completely new to some parts of our Movement, and the majority of the individual contributors to our projects may find it difficult to relate to something like this, as they may find it unclear on how it affects their individual work. We strongly encourage you to participate in one (or more!) venues of engagement in our community conversations round, be it attending a scheduled call, commenting on the Meta talk page of the Global Council, Hubs, Roles & Responsibilities, or Glossary draft chapters (in any language that you feel comfortable), or take part in the open Movement Charter sessions during Wikimania 2023, in-person or virtually. You may also get in touch directly with the Charter Ambassador from your project or language community, if there is one.
I represent a Wikimedia movement affiliate (chapter, user group, or thematic organization). How can I be involved in community conversations?
We strongly encourage you to participate in one (or more!) venues of engagement in our community conversations round, be it attending a scheduled call, commenting on the Meta talk page of the Global Council, Hubs, Roles & Responsibilities, or Glossary draft chapters (in any language that you feel comfortable), or take part in the open Movement Charter sessions during Wikimania 2023, in-person or virtually. You may also host a call with your affiliate about the published Movement Charter drafts to discuss feedback and invite MCDC members to join the call to answer your questions.
I represent a group/organization that is yet to be recognized as a Wikimedia movement affiliate, or an informal, self-organized group that is outside of the Affiliate model. How can I be involved in community conversations?
You may be from a group that is still very new and seeking ways to grow and be recognized in the Affiliate ecosystem, or from an informal group (e.g. WikiProjects) that is outside of that ecosystem. Similar to the two groups above, you are welcome to participate in one (or more!) venues of engagement in our community conversations round, be it attending a scheduled call, commenting on the Meta talk page of the Global Council, Hubs, Roles & Responsibilities, or Glossary draft chapters (in any language that you feel comfortable), take part in the open Movement Charter sessions during Wikimania 2023, in-person or virtually, or emailing us at movementcharter@wikimedia.org with your feedback.
I am part of the group that is piloting a Hub in my region or in a certain thematic area. How can I be involved in community conversations?
One focus of the current community consultation will focus on the draft chapter on Hubs. You may remember or have participated in the previous global conversations about Hubs, from which the draft chapter is being built upon. Your feedback, through the community conversation venues, are very much welcome.
Where can I learn more about the Movement Charter Ambassadors Program?
Please see the Ambassadors Program Frequently Asked Questions.
Content topics
내 지역에서 "공식적인" 허브 대화 또는 파일럿을 제안하려면 어떻게 해야 합니까?
운동 헌장 초안 작성 위원회는 허브를 정의할 책임이 있지만 승인할 책임은 없습니다. 허브 작업에 관심이 있는 경우 허브 대화 논의(2022년 3월) 및 허브 파일럿에 대한 초기 지침(2022년 9월)을 읽어보는 것이 좋습니다. 자금이 필요한 경우 위키미디어 재단에서 운동 전략 구현 보조금을 신청할 수 있습니다. 아직 공식적인 승인 절차가 없기 때문에 위키미디어 재단에서 자금을 지원받는 경우에도 아직 "공식 허브"가 없다는 점에 유의하십시오. 허브는 현재 파일럿 단계에 있습니다. 운동 헌장이 완성되면 기존 허브 구조가 헌장에 맞게 구조를 변경해야 할 수도 있다는 점도 주목할 가치가 있습니다.
What is the current state of affairs when it comes to funds (raising and dissemination) in the Movement Charter?
The Global Council draft includes proposals for the Global Council’s involvement with fundraising and funds dissemination, including open questions for community input. Likewise, the Hubs draft also includes proposals for what hubs can do in terms of fundraising and funds dissemination.
비준
How will the Movement Charter be ratified?
There was a ratification methodology proposed in April 2023. The proposal involves a slightly different voting or ratification process for: individual contributors, Wikimedia projects, Wikimedia affiliates and the Wikimedia Foundation’s Board of Trustees. Individuals would vote on SecurePoll or a similar platform. Individuals would also select a project towards which their vote counts. Each project and affiliate, as well as the Board, would need more than 50% support to successfully ratify the Movement Charter.
모든 투표 그룹은 서로 같은 가중치를 가집니다?
- 응답: 위키미디어 재단의 이사회는 다른 세 투표 그룹 모두가 이미 찬성표를 던진 경우에만 헌장 수락에 투표할 것입니다. 즉, 개별 기여자, 그룹으로서의 프로젝트, 그룹으로서의 계열사로부터 (최소한) 다수의 지지가 있지 않는 한 그들은 투표조차 할 수 없습니다. 그들이 다른 세 그룹과 동등한 가중치를 갖고 있다고 인식하기 쉽지만, 그들의 "무게"는 다른 모든 그룹이 지원해야 합니다. 따라서 그들은 다른 그룹보다 결과를 통제하는 능력이 훨씬 적습니다. 즉, 4개의 투표 그룹(개인 기여자, 프로젝트, 가맹단체 및 BoT) 모두 운동 헌장을 비준하려면 비준에 찬성해야 합니다. 한 투표 그룹의 반대는 운동 헌장이 비준되지 않음을 의미합니다.
Can each individual's vote be counted more than once?
Yes. Individuals cast a direct vote on the voting platform (e.g. SecurePoll); that same vote will also be counted towards a Wikimedia project of their choice. Also, members of affiliate organizations may be able to vote within their affiliates.
How does this compare to other ratification methods in the movement?
Other ratification efforts, including the Universal Code of Conduct and its Enforcement Guidelines, have allowed every qualified voter to cost a vote in favor or opposition of ratification, and the majority vote decided the outcome. Because of the potential for the Movement Charter to change the entire structure of the Wikimedia movement, we need a more extensive ratification process that would explicitly allow a ratification vote from each of the major structures within the movement: the individual contributors, the affiliates, the Wikimedia projects and the WMF Board of Trustees.
운동 헌장의 각 섹션이 아닌 전체 운동 헌장에 투표하는 근거는 무엇입니까?
헌장의 내용이 서로 얽혀 있습니다. 예를 들어 의사 결정 장은 역할 및 책임 장과 밀접하게 연결되어 있으며 둘 다 서로 의존적입니다. 이것이 문서 전체를 비준해야 하는 이유입니다.
구성원
Is there any other party that participates in the Committee’s processes?
Since June 2022, we have invited two members of the Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees (Natalia and Shani) to attend our bi-weekly meetings as liaisons. Both of them have spent years working within the Wikimedia community. They have been valuable to us in terms of being a sounding board and giving suggestions. They give input as individuals with experiences within the Wikimedia movement, which includes their roles as trustees; but their suggestions and inputs are not official positions from the Board of Trustees.. They do not have a vote when it comes to the Committee’s decisions.
초안 작성 위원회가 신입 회원 수락을 중단하기로 결정한 이유는 무엇입니까?
- 1년 넘게 진행된 프로세스를 누군가에게 안내하는 것은 정말 시간이 많이 걸립니다. 이것이 초안 위원회에서 2023년 1월 1일 이후에 신입 회원을 받지 않는 주된 이유입니다. 작업 도중에 합류한 회원들이 따라잡기 어려웠다는 것을 경험으로 알고 있습니다. 또한 특정 주제에 대해 그룹에서 작업할 때 해당 주제에 대한 경험이나 지식이 있는 개별 커뮤니티 구성원에게 연락하여 도움을 받을 수 있다는 것도 알고 있습니다. 특정 섹션을 작성하는 데 적극적으로 역할을 수행하기 위해 누군가를 위원회의 정회원으로 만들 필요가 없습니다.