Meta:Requests for bureaucratship/Jafeluv
- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a closed Meta-Wiki request. Please do not modify it.
Successful, flag granted. --WizardOfOz talk 20:46, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
Jafeluv edit
- Jafeluv (talk • email • contributions • deleted contributions • all logs • blocks • deletions • protections)
I'm aware Meta doesn't exactly have a shortage of bureaucrats, but here goes anyway.
Request at SRUC often include an account on Meta and I would like to be able to rename them locally myself without having to refer them to CHU. As a (newly-elected) steward I'm familiar with user renaming and rights changes and believe that I can be trusted not to break anything with the additional tools. I meet the requirements (6 months of adminship[1] and 150 logged actions[2]). Thanks for your consideration. Jafeluv 20:41, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
- Comment - Users must always be deferred to CHU when renames at meta needs to be done, for transparency; as not all bureaucrats might be watching SRUC ;-) Cheers, -- Dferg ☎ talk 20:56, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
- I'll keep that in mind :P Jafeluv 21:00, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
- Crat endorse - Fine by me. There is always some work that needs to be done and any helping hand is welcome. -Barras 22:01, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
Support Why not? -FASTILY (TALK) 06:28, 22 March 2011 (UTC)- Support Grunny (talk) 08:56, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
- Support No problem --Herby talk thyme 09:33, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
- Support –BruTe talk 10:29, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
- Support - Trijnstel 14:32, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
- Support mickit 14:44, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
- Support, why not? - Hoo man (talk) 20:01, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
