Meta:Requests for adminship/Werdna 2

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a closed Meta-Wiki request. Please do not modify it.

100% support - promoted. --Anonymous Dissident^Talk 07:59, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Werdna edit

I've had temporary adminship for 3 months or so to work on the spam blacklist, and I now satisfy the requirements for adminship here (although I haven't spent ages on it, I've helped out every now and then, as time permits). I'm an admin on enwiki, and a bureaucrat on mediawiki.org and the test wiki. I intend to continue my occasional spam blacklist work. I've got 180 edits here, and a few thousand on enwiki. Werdna 07:43, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Support - Your contribution to the blacklists and the Global blocking is highly appreciated and your contributions overall is good :) ..--Comet styles 08:08, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Sure. guillom 13:02, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
per comet --.snoopy.  13:14, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Of course. Soxred93 14:31, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support Hard to oppose!--Cato 16:02, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support And I wonder why one could oppose. Huji 16:31, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support - looks good to me :-) . Monobi (talk) 16:59, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Nick1915 -^{all you want} 17:12, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support iAlex 17:17, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oh my goodness yes. Thought he was one already. ++Lar: t/c 17:26, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- He is :-P . Monobi (talk) 18:02, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
support —DerHexer (Talk) 17:52, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support I trust the user with the tools. --Kanonkas 18:26, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cbrown1023 talk 23:22, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support Definitely fits my bill. Good luck! Razorflame 04:12, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Anonymous Dissident^Talk 06:49, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
support! --Thogo (talk) 11:32, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Marbot 14:18, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MF-W 14:40, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Meno25 14:41, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very trustworthy editor. Acalamari 16:12, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support Despite your lame name :/ --Werdan7^{T @} 00:20, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support per AusCabal directive...oh, wait...I meant, spam blacklist work - yeah, that one! :) Daniel (talk) 01:23, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support _~Innv^s: 03:27, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Avi 14:56, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support Alex Pereira ^falaê 15:00, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support Of course --Fabexplosive The archive man 15:12, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support, trustworthy. giggy _(:O) 05:55, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support A familiar name.--Cato 22:10, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support Yup ! --Mardetanha ^talk 22:23, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support. WjBscribe 23:51, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 00:43, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Erwin(85) 08:41, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support (heh, I supported You last time too, nearly forgot) --birdy geimfyglið _(:> )=| ∇ 10:06, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ahonc 10:08, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support MiCkE 15:21, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Prevert 19:28, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Tacaíocht - of course :) - Alison ^❤ 07:52, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nishkid64 (talk) 21:27, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Millosh 07:56, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]