Meta:Requests for adminship/Cool Cat
- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a closed Meta-Wiki request. Please do not modify it.
Vote closed. Result: Request failed per ineligibility (no local sysop).--Aphaia 10:13, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I am requesting adminship on Meta for this account. --Cool CatTalk|@ 18:38, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- I am not a fan of editcountism but I'll provide statistics anyways... 223 Meta, 1041 commons, 21324 en.wikipedia, 69 tr.wikipedia, etc...
- Support --Cspurrier 20:32, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Support --M/ 21:14, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- As I wrote on a similar election, whilst I confirm my positive opinion on this user, I ask him to repeat the vote for meta adminship to get a larger consensus within a couple of month, after complying with all the candidacy pre-requisites. In the meantime, I really thank him for his contributions against vandalism. --M/ 14:37, 5 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Support -- Obradovic Goran 21:16, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Question: Are you a sysop on a local project? Korg + + 00:07, 5 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Sadly not, people are kinda paranoid about my adminship... I am only active in commons and en (and somewhat here) so this is the only place I can read the stuff and actualy understand. So I can make good use of admin tools here such as blocking off vandals. I actualy have a vandal bot looking over this wiki on freenode, #wikimedia-meta :) --Cool CatTalk|@ 01:03, 5 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you for your reply; so I will not vote at present. Korg + + 01:38, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Sadly not, people are kinda paranoid about my adminship... I am only active in commons and en (and somewhat here) so this is the only place I can read the stuff and actualy understand. So I can make good use of admin tools here such as blocking off vandals. I actualy have a vandal bot looking over this wiki on freenode, #wikimedia-meta :) --Cool CatTalk|@ 01:03, 5 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- A vote is useless in this case. Cool Cat cannot be made admin because of the fact that the requirements are not met. My vote would be disregarded even if I support this candidacy. --Marbot 18:09, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose.. Sorry. I don't have anything personal against you, but you have a history of shall we say, less than well thought out actions. That doesn't seem suitable for adminship. You've been kind enough to compile en:User:Cool Cat/RfAs, but dismissing that as paranoia doesn't seem appropriate. - Taxman 22:54, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- I did nothing to warrant people to threaten to leave wikipedia over my adminship same person later lecture me about civility. I have to dismiss baseless paranoia. What conduct are we talking about? Please make spesific points on my talk page so I can fix. :) --Cool CatTalk|@ 13:00, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose. Cool Cat can't apply. besides, I disagree, for the same reasons exposed on Commons, [1]. villy ♦✎ 23:18, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose. 1) Ineligible, 2) per those above. Essjay Talk • Contact 15:19, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose per above and probably more... WhiteNight T | @ | C 05:03, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]