Meta:Requests for adminship/Bastique

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a closed Meta-Wiki request. Please do not modify it.

Bastique

I'm requesting the sysop bit in order to help with the usual admin chores. Many of you already know me, admin on en:, admin/bureaucrat on commons:, tens of thousands of edits across the projects with my involvement with commons as well as my stewardship. Like the other new stewards, my activities on meta have greatly increased since attaining stewardship. As I'm spending much more time in meta now, I feel the sysop bit would be helpful. Bastique 17:20, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Support --.anaconda 17:33, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --M/ 17:35, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Steel ^en:Steel 17:41, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Slade ♠ 17:43, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Eagle 101 20:28, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support -- absolutely. Redux 20:35, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Pill δ 20:49, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
A little boring support. — Timi chal 21:31, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- NoSeptember 21:43, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Flcelloguy (A note?) 03:16, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Afinogenoff 05:53, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aphaia 06:09, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support a good steward -- MichaelFrey 08:28, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Edward Chernenko 11:27, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
guillom 11:40, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support. --Yaroslav Zolotaryov 14:13, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

* Oppose there are already A LOT sysops on the meta. that is more than enough, if you need to delete or protect or block,rest assured..there is an army behind you!..don't take it as a personal insult,that is may be my vote for the coming years or if the 72 disappear. i voted for you earlier btw--Alnokta 13:18, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

- However we are here to coordinate projects, not to fight vandals. As admin I am happy other guys manage it and let me concentrate my own work only I am concerned. On meta, and I think it is consensus (see talk), we suffer sysop shortage in spite of your fantasy. --Aphaia 14:52, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Alnokta, perhaps you could throw in your opinion on the talk page discussion? The points raised over there suggest that there isn't an army of Meta admins behind us. -- Steel ^en:Steel 17:18, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alnokta 23:39, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Jusjih 16:40, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support, no risk here, and don't agree with "too many sysops". xaosflux ^Talk 16:42, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support We do indeed need more sysops on Meta. Why is it when I tag a page to be deleted it takes so long? And, I can trust Bastique. --Majorly 16:59, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
+1 --dario vet (talk) 17:37, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support duh. :) Cbrown1023 20:35, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
support - the only question for RfAs are 'can we trust him?' well 'yes we can!'--Doc glasgow 21:01, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Nishkid64 21:02, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support, obviously... Another new steward that has seen an increase in activity here after gaining stewardship. ++Lar: t/c 21:24, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Az1568 21:29, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cspurrier 01:06, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support - JoeSmack 05:11, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support - of course Bryan 19:06, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Bertrand GRONDIN – ^Talk 22:10, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Thogo (talk) 00:09, 5 February 2007 (UTC) Thought you are already...[reply]
Support Pschemp 00:09, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Sarah Ewart 07:42, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support, of course. Sufficient Meta activity thanks to stewardship. --Coredesat (en.wp) 15:26, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support? I thought stewards were auto adminised on meta? --Cat out 17:52, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
No. — Timi chal 18:20, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Marbot 19:12, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Eh? Support ! Misza13 22:08, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support FrancoGG ^{( talk )} 22:55, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support candidate is clearly qualified and, per the Steward election, enjoys broad support from the wider community. Newyorkbrad 04:23, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
La gazzetta dello Support --Vito Genovese 11:22, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --A. B. ^(talk) 20:07, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Phil | Talk 21:05, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --FloNight 23:42, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Grand master ka 04:53, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Jon Harald Søby 14:09, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Seems fine --Kim Bruning 19:46, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support of course --Filip (§) 00:13, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

(47/0/3) Sysop flag granted by Datrio: [1] - 18:17, 9 February 2007 Datrio (Talk | contribs | block) changed group membership for User:Bastique from steward to steward, sysop