Meta:Requests for adminship/Abigor 3

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a closed Meta-Wiki request. Please do not modify it.

Abigor

Abigor (talk • contribs • count • logs • page moves • block log • CA • email)

Hello,

I lost my adminbit with the last inactivaty run, I was busy at the time and didn't had anytime for my work. Normally I work on the global spam blacklist and I checked there today and there is again a backlog.

The work there can only be done by administrators so I'm here to request my bit back.

Best, Huib talk ^Abigor 07:46, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nay per candidate's infinite block in Dutch Wikipedia due to sock-puppetry, as I can see here. — [ Tanvir | Talk ] 08:11, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Neen - considering the current problems surrounding Abigor, I do not think it would be a wise step. Blocked on his home wiki nl.wikipedia for sockpuppetry ([1]) and involved in several disputes/heated arguments on Wikimedia Commons ([2], [3], [4]) with several personal attacks going back and forth. I suggest to not grant admin status at this point, and perhaps reconsider when the situation has cooled down. Effeietsanders 08:35, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The Dutch Wikipedia is not my home wiki or have ever been used as home wiki. And I'm requesting admin for sbl only, more people have been granted admin for sbl only. Don't know where commons or nl.wiki is relevant? Huib talk ^Abigor 08:43, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I share the concerns of the previous users. micki t 08:51, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Per Tanvir Vibhijain 09:05, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Effeietsanders. Plus I don't feel comfortable with this user (issues on nl-wiki and Commons) having sysoprights on Meta again. Trijnstel 09:46, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Per above. Sometimes local issues interfere globally. Checking his contributions, I see recent problems on nl.wiki, where he is blocked due to sockpuppetry and issues raised on this discussion on Commons should be solved first in my opinion. I also don't think that "go to hell" and "shut up" is the correct tone a sysop should use as it was done on Commons. If it was said there, probably will be said here, unless there's a behavioral change. However, I'm sure you can help without this tool.” T_ele^s (T_alk _{@ C S}) 14:04, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
No way after what I've seen in Commons. --Darwinius 15:13, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per concerns with user's conduct on commons and nlwiki, as well as the fact that the candidate has no need for the tools. Their only edits within two months are asking for adminship again. Ajraddatz (Talk) 15:17, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Concerns with temperament and recent sockpuppetry. Sorry, FASTILY ^(TALK) 16:46, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - just two days ago Abigor stated he would "wipe his ass with every policy he can find" (see here) - Jcb 16:47, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Maybe all in all a good guy but not stable enough in his behaviour. Fontes 16:51, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Per above. Jarii94 16:55, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Per above. Apoo 17:27, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Jcb and all above. --WizardOfOz ^talk 17:52, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment to Crats: can we get a SNOW closure here, save the candidate anymore opposes? Thx fr33kman 18:15, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose User had the bit removed due to inactivity, no signs point to revitalized activity, and poor behavior at Commons reflects badly on the user's ability to foster positive relationships between administrators and the people they serve. – Adrignola talk 04:08, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Closed as Snow -- Quentinv57 ^(talk) 07:13, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]