Grants talk:Programs/Wikimedia Community Fund/Conference Fund/Wikimedia CEE Meeting 2023
Latest comment: 1 year ago by CAlmog (WMF) in topic [Request] Addition to the budget
WMF review and feedback
editThank you very much @Mehman; @User:MIKHEIL; @Jaba1977 and the 2023 CEE team for working on this proposal.
It was great reading through your proposal. It is clear, well presented and the event seems to be well planned.
Here are a few questions and comments I had:
- One of the objectives is to: "Proving help and support for small-size Wikimedia affiliates and organizations, encouraging them to expand their scope of work and international collaboration". It is a great goal to prioritize and I was wondering if you have any practices or specific actions on how to do it other than sharing knowledge.
- Regional events are a high priority obviously, but other than having this annual space and platform to convene, we wish to see some kind of linkage or continuity from one year to the other. Can you point out at something that happened or changed since last year CEE? Are there any objectives that are directly linked to, or the result of things that were developed in the region or in the last year/event?
- If scholarships to non-affiliated will be decided and discussed over the village pump, you might be needing to actively facilitate and monitor the discussions.
- You have compiled a great team, well capable for sure.
- As to the risks - I appreciate your intention to work and engage with communities that will be facing challenges in selecting representatives. It might be a good idea to outline a few basic recommended guidelines for communities to refer to. And even if facing challenges - please make sure to remain sensitive and aware to internal community practices and be sure to engage in a positive manner as advisories.
- We will need to keep checking in with our International Health & Security Risk Management services (ISOS) to remain updated and monitor if and how the war will affect the event. In the hopes it will no longer be a risk by the time the event will take place.
Budget:
- I am not sure I am clear on the total participants breakdown - 92 locals + regional + international. 6-7 WMF staff. But it doesn’t sum up to the total 150 p you indicated. Who are the rest? Are those partners? or self funded participants?
- Can you please elaborate on the learning days section? What are you planning to do? for how long? who is the target audience? is there actually a true need to accommodate learning days? I know this is something that was done traditionally, but I am not fully informed on the impact and outcomes of these learning days. Do you have any indications for this being a crucial/impactful/required part on the event?
- Catering - is calculated for how many people?
- Printed conference agenda - I do not recommend printing the actual program. The agenda will probably change many times even in the last days before the conference and probably while the conference is happening. This is very standard and keeping the agenda online, will allow you much needed flexibility. If you want, you can print other materials (although we always advise to avoid unnecessary printing for environmental reasons) but I strongly recommend keeping the agenda online and maybe only printing a QR code that will be linked to the agenda. I personally find it very useful to print a QR code on the name tag instead.
- Who will facilitate the sessions and discussions? Will it be facilitated by community members?
Thank you again for a wonderful proposal. looking forward to hearing from you. CAlmog (WMF) (talk) 03:44, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
|
[Request] Addition to the budget
editHello Chen,
As we agreed on email, we want an additional budget to cover the cost of invited delegates for our conference. The amount of the additional budget is 7,236.00 USD. Thanks for support. – Mehman (WMGE) 17:27, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
- Hi Mehman, Your request is approved. CAlmog (WMF) (talk) 18:49, 16 August 2023 (UTC)