CentralNotice/Request/WMCZ Describe a monument contest 2019

WMCZ Describe a monument contest 2019Edit

What is the purpose of the campaign? How will you measure the success of the campaign?Edit

Description -

Metrics -

What banner(s) will you use? What will be your landing page?Edit

Is this project grant funded? Please provide a linkEdit

Type of grant -

Link to grant -

DiscussionEdit

Central Notice admin commentsEdit

  • Targetting users with a number of edits requires JavaScript. I don't know nothing about that. @Seddon (WMF): Could you please take a look here as well? Thanks. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 23:23, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
  • I will work on the campaign without the JS thing for now. It can be amended later to include it. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 13:55, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
  • Campaign (preview) · Desktop banner · Mobile banner. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 14:15, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
  • Campaign and banners all set up. They'll start running at the requested date. The JS thing is still missing though. If we cannot get it before the designated date, the banner will run for logged-in users only. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 14:19, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
@MarcoAurelio: I don't want to edit conflict anyone, can I edit this? is there a sandbox I can play with? or should I use beta cluster? (I think I made myself a steward there so I should be able to become a CN admin :) ) (for the 100 edits JS) --Jeremyb (talk) 23:56, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
P.S. where's a good place for general discussion/questions? I tried Talk:CentralNotice and I have some more questions on the way. --Jeremyb (talk) 23:56, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
@Jeremyb: Hi! I am not currently editting this banner a.t.m. I am not aware of any sandbox in production though. I think test.wikipedia operates a different instance of CentralNotice and maybe the beta cluster can be a good place as well. I usually ask @Seddon (WMF): when in doubt :-) Best regards, —MarcoAurelio (talk) 14:09, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
oh, right forgot about test Wikipedia good call. Thanks --Jeremyb (talk) 14:18, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
  • @MarcoAurelio:, @MarcoAurelio: I implemented edit count test JS but I'm unclear exactly what was the requested criteria. but should be easy now to change the threshold and flip the comparison (e.g. from > to < or > to >= ). or I could do it. --Jeremyb (talk) 13:54, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
    • @Jeremyb: Thanks for the help. I think that what @Aktron wanted is that the banner be displayed to registered users with less than 100 edits (I guess that's to encourage new contributors to participate). Best regards, —MarcoAurelio (talk) 14:11, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
      • @MarcoAurelio: testing edit count for anons is harder/more expensive. (but unclear if you were trying to test that too?) now both banners will display for all anons and also for registered users with less than 100 edits. but I didn't flip the anon checkboxes. --Jeremyb (talk) 14:43, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
        • @Jeremyb: Hello. As far as I understand the request is to have the banner displayed for all anonymous users and, for the registered users, only for those with less than 100 edits. I don't think we need to check IP edits. Best regards, —MarcoAurelio (talk) 21:50, 8 January 2019 (UTC)