Wikitechnokracja

This page is a translated version of the page Wikitechnocracy and the translation is 29% complete.
Other languages:
Społeczność
Antywiki
Conflict-driven view
False community
Wikikultura
Wikiwiara
The Wiki process
The wiki way
Darwikinism
Power structure
Wikianarchizm
Wikibiurokracja
Wikidemokratyzm
WikiDemocracy
Wikidespotyzm
Wikifederalizm
Wikihierarchizm
Wikimerytokracja
Wikimobocracy
Wikindywidualizm
Wikioligarchizm
Wikiplutokracja
Wikirepublikanizm
Wikisceptycyzm
Wikitechnokracja
Współpraca
Antifactionalism
Factionalism
Społeczny
Exopedianism
Mesopedianism
Metapedianism
Overall content structure
Transclusionism
Antitransclusionism
Categorism
Structurism
Encyclopedia standards
Delecjonizm
Delusionism
Ekskluzjonizm
Inkluzjonizm
Precyzjonizm
Notability
Esencjalizm
Inkrementalizm
Długość artykułu
Mergism
Separatism
Measuring accuracy
Eventualism
Immediatism
Miscellaneous
Antiovertranswikism
Mediawikianism
Post-Deletionism
Transwikism
Wikidynamism
Wikisecessionism
Redirectionism

"Wikitechnokracja" przyznaje Wikipedii i innym podmiotom w sferze Wiki działającym jako technokracje moc i autorytet do bycia uznawanym za ekspertów w odpowiadających dziedzinach

It favors centralized, sometimes wikihierarchical leadership rather than evolution of standards through a decentralized, wikidynamist process of spontaneous order.

An example of a wikitechnocratic body is the bot approval group; its reason for being is that most members of the community do not understand bots, and therefore are not well-equipped to make bot approval decisions.

One of the arguments for wikitechnocracy is that it takes time for the community to reach consensus, and in the meantime progress is held up.

Sometimes, the community may never reach consensus, and the system permanently stagnates on that issue.

The Wikimedia Foundation and its developers have played a major leadership role in helping technical and other standards emerge in the wikisphere. For example, the mw:coding conventions page lists practices that are expected to be followed in all code checked into git, and the system of +2 approvers ensures that there is an orderly system of deciding what should go in the core. This has been influential on the technical aspects of the wikisphere.