Wikispace
Wikipedia does have articles on outer space, however, wikipedia does not have 3d models of a planet, Wikispace is a library and 3d models of star systems and planets with composition and orbital velocity of a planet and temperature and mass of stars
| WikiSpace | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Status of the proposal | |
| Status | procedurally closed |
| Reason | no reason this couldn’t be covered everywhere else Dronebogus (talk) 07:37, 24 August 2023 (UTC) |
| Details of the proposal | |
| Project description | database about outer space with 3d experiences |
| Is it a multilingual wiki? | Many language versions or single multilingual platform |
| Potential number of languages | Multilangguage |
| Proposed tagline | free space encyclopedia |
| Proposed URL | wikispace.org |
| Technical requirements | |
| New features to require | ability to upload 3d files |
| Development wiki | No |
| Interested participants | |
SevenEagleX (Bicara) | |
Proposed by edit
Alternative names edit
- Wikisky
- AstroWiki
Related projects/proposals edit
Domain names edit
wikispace.org
Mailing list links edit
Demos edit
People interested edit
Discussion edit
Oppose Such models can go on Wikipedia. Faster than Thunder (talk) 15:40, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
Comment but that's kinda weird, how is it possible that some articles on wikipedia have 3d images but others don't SevenEagleX(Bicara) 08:08, 26 July 2023 (UTC)- @SevenEagleX: "Some articles won't feature a 3D image" is not a valid reason to start a new wiki. QuickQuokka [talk • contribs] 15:24, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
Weak support I would be in favor of this project if it was more similar to an online interactive planetarium rather than "Wikipedia but for astronomy". There is room that a new planetarium project and an astronomy subproject on Wikipedia could work together, but other than that Wikipedia and Wikidata can handle most of it. Doctor Zoath (talk page) 01:07, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
Oppose I think we should just expand WMC’s 3D model collection and capabilities rather than creating a new project which will inevitably struggle to form any kind of independent identity and userbase. (The logo is dope though) Dronebogus (talk) 13:28, 8 August 2023 (UTC)- Oppose These types of 3D models are really cool and educational. But why not just add these 3D models to Wikipedia? I simply don't see why a separate wiki would be created for this, one that would almost certainly be a ghost town. Pecopteris (talk) 02:51, 19 August 2023 (UTC)