Wikimedia Foundation elections/Board elections/2008/Results/en
The election ended 21 June 2008. No more votes will be accepted.
The results were announced on 26 June 2008.
The results were announced on 26 June 2008.
In other languages: العربية (ar) беларуская (тарашкевіца) (be-x-old) català (ca) čeština (cs) Deutsch (de) Ελληνικά (el) English (en) Esperanto (eo) español (es) فارسی (fa) suomi (fi) français (fr) galego (gl) עברית (he) hrvatski (hr) Bahasa Indonesia (id) italiano (it) 日本語 (ja) 한국어 (ko) Ripoarisch (ksh) Lëtzebuergesch (lb) മലയാളം (ml) Bahasa Melayu (ms) norsk bokmål (nb) Nederlands (nl) occitan (oc) polski (pl) português (pt) română (ro) русский (ru) српски / srpski (sr) svenska (sv) українська (uk) Tiếng Việt (vi) 粵語 (yue) 中文(繁體) (zh-hant) 中文(简体) (zh-hans) [edit]
2008 Board elections |
---|
Organization |
The 2008 Wikimedia Board Election Committee would like to announce the results of the 2008 Board Elections. The winner is Ting Chen. These results will be certified by the Board of Trustees at their next meeting, where he will be appointed effective 16 July 2008. This position will be effective until July 2009.
In total, 3019 valid ballots were cast; the specific results are as outlined below. A complete dump of the ballots cast is available here.
Pairwise defeats table | |||||||||||||||
A.H. | A.B. | C.S. | D.R. | G.K. | H.C. | J.H. | K.W. | M.B. | P.W. | R.S. | R.P. | S.K. | S.S. | T.C. | |
Ad Huikeshoven | - | 781 | 934 | 920 | 1115 | 806 | 832 | 1022 | 987 | 1030 | 848 | 901 | 764 | 868 | 674 |
Alex Bakharev | 950 | - | 1073 | 1054 | 1236 | 984 | 983 | 1134 | 1109 | 1173 | 990 | 1052 | 932 | 1028 | 844 |
Craig Spurrier | 571 | 537 | - | 600 | 845 | 530 | 583 | 721 | 646 | 695 | 578 | 587 | 498 | 577 | 473 |
Dan Rosenthal | 691 | 654 | 721 | - | 960 | 660 | 724 | 844 | 780 | 858 | 711 | 707 | 609 | 699 | 595 |
Gregory Kohs | 461 | 412 | 491 | 472 | - | 471 | 471 | 513 | 523 | 541 | 467 | 468 | 434 | 461 | 411 |
Harel Cain | 896 | 836 | 1007 | 959 | 1160 | - | 892 | 1075 | 1047 | 1080 | 917 | 964 | 799 | 904 | 731 |
Jussi-Ville Heiskanen | 714 | 720 | 850 | 827 | 1057 | 755 | - | 970 | 912 | 943 | 737 | 841 | 712 | 798 | 621 |
Kurt M. Weber | 588 | 535 | 595 | 566 | 787 | 547 | 581 | - | 634 | 679 | 588 | 553 | 528 | 573 | 505 |
Matthew Bisanz | 508 | 498 | 552 | 513 | 785 | 509 | 534 | 653 | - | 677 | 531 | 473 | 465 | 507 | 472 |
Paul Williams | 439 | 420 | 429 | 471 | 754 | 435 | 464 | 566 | 521 | - | 470 | 426 | 410 | 466 | 380 |
Ray Saintonge | 714 | 703 | 812 | 789 | 987 | 727 | 745 | 879 | 848 | 899 | - | 769 | 641 | 738 | 629 |
Ryan Postlethwaite | 772 | 702 | 804 | 741 | 1027 | 756 | 770 | 880 | 837 | 921 | 797 | - | 726 | 755 | 674 |
Samuel Klein | 924 | 910 | 1019 | 967 | 1183 | 911 | 983 | 1099 | 1069 | 1126 | 941 | 980 | - | 971 | 836 |
Steve Smith | 729 | 694 | 796 | 734 | 1007 | 712 | 750 | 876 | 840 | 884 | 778 | 744 | 654 | - | 650 |
Ting Chen | 1135 | 1086 | 1263 | 1248 | 1421 | 1108 | 1151 | 1344 | 1306 | 1354 | 1182 | 1245 | 1044 | 1190 | - |
Each figure represents the number of voters who ranked the candidate at the left better than the candidate at the top. A figure in bold represents a victory in that pairwise comparison by the candidate at the left. | |||||||||||||||
Ranking of candidates | |||||||||||||||
Number of overall pairwise victories over other candidates | |||||||||||||||
1. Ting Chen | 14 | ||||||||||||||
2. Alex Bakharev | 13 | ||||||||||||||
3. Samuel Klein | 12 | ||||||||||||||
4. Harel Cain | 11 | ||||||||||||||
5. Ad Huikeshoven | 10 | ||||||||||||||
6. Jussi-Ville Heiskanen | 8 | ||||||||||||||
7. Ryan Postlethwaite | 8 | ||||||||||||||
8. Steve Smith | 7 | ||||||||||||||
9. Ray Saintonge | 7 | ||||||||||||||
10. Dan Rosenthal | 5 | ||||||||||||||
11. Craig Spurrier | 4 | ||||||||||||||
12. Matthew Bisanz | 3 | ||||||||||||||
13. Kurt M. Weber | 2 | ||||||||||||||
14. Paul Williams | 1 | ||||||||||||||
15. Gregory Kohs | 0 | ||||||||||||||
The ranking was determined by the number of pairwise victories against other candidates by each candidate. Ties in the number of the pairwise victories were automatically resolved by comparing who won in the pairwise comparisons between the tied candidates. |