User talk:Pmlineditor/Archives/04-11
Please do not post any new comments on this page. This is a discussion archive first created on 1 November 2004, although the comments contained were likely posted before and after this date. See current discussion or the archives index. |
Autopatroller
Hello, can I be granted autopatroller here? I am also an autopatroller over at enwiki and commons. Thanks, —§ stay (sic)! 05:29, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
- Done --WizardOfOz talk 06:45, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks, Wizard! Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 08:38, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 7 February 2011
- News and notes: New General Counsel hired; reuse of Google Art Project debated; GLAM newsletter started; news in brief
- WikiProject report: Stargazing aboard WikiProject Spaceflight
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Open cases: Shakespeare authorship – Longevity; Motions on Date delinking, Eastern European mailing list
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Hello
Hi Pmlineditor, with regard to your oppose vote on my Steward candidacy,
Not all of my cross-wiki work translates well into what is visible with the Steward elections. If you'd like, I can give you a rundown of my cross-wiki work to help alleviate any concerns over inexperience in that area. Furthermore, while I cannot speak foreign languages very well, it has not interfered with my cross-wiki and foreign language wiki work. In fact, for the 2010 fundraiser, I was responsible for helping implement translations, as well as assisting with outreach and foundation assistance on smaller wikis. Though this does not translate well into edit-count, there are numerous people involved with the fundraiser that can vouch for my cross-wiki and language capability being sufficient for the task. I hope this alleviates any concerns you have, and please feel free to get in touch with me on my talk page for any questions. ⇒SWATJester Son of the Defender 22:39, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
Eligibility
Technically, there is only eligibility requirements for the steward election, not confirmation which has nothing to do with "votes". Ottava Rima (talk) 15:59, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
- Yes, I realize it was a mistake (I was actually looking through the confirmations page to see whether their was any criteria for eligibility when you made this comment.) Anyways, it seems that the issue has been handled, and the comment restored. Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 16:18, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 14 February 2011
- News and notes: Foundation report; gender statistics; DMCA takedowns; brief news
- In the news: Wikipedia wrongly blamed for Super Bowl gaffe; "digital natives" naive about Wikipedia; brief news
- WikiProject report: Articles for Creation
- Features and admins: RFAs and active admins—concerns expressed over the continuing drought
- Arbitration report: Proposed decisions in Shakespeare and Longevity; two new cases; motions passed, and more
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 21 February 2011
- News and notes: Gender gap and sexual images; India consultant; brief news
- In the news: Egyptian revolution and Wikimania 2008; Jimmy Wales' move to the UK, Africa and systemic bias; brief news
- WikiProject report: More than numbers: WikiProject Mathematics
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Longevity and Shakespeare cases close; what do these decisions tell us?
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 28 February 2011
- News and notes: Newbies vs. patrollers; Indian statistics; brief news
- Arbitration statistics: Arbitration Committee hearing fewer cases; longer decision times
- WikiProject report: In Tune with WikiProject Classical Music
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: AUSC applications open; interim desysopping; two pending cases
- Technology report: HTML5 adopted but soon reverted; brief news
Just a question
It is interesting that those "recent" blocks occurred over one year ago. So how long show i wait another year, lol.--Avidius 11:46, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
- Entirely my error, sorry; I read 2010 as 2011. However, I still think that you have too few edits to be given access to the tool, and suggest you do active editing for some more time (say a month) and make a request in the page. Also, please provide a link in your meta-wiki userpage to your en-wiki userpage and vice-versa to confirm that you are the enwiki Avidus, since you do not seem to have SUL. Regards, Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 11:52, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you very much. I've provided a link to my English Wikipedia page, where you can also see that for over 3 years I've made about 2,200 edits. I am not sure if that is sufficient but it seems that users with less edits have already gained positive answers for their requests.--Avidius 20:11, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 7 March 2011
- News and notes: Foundation looking for "storyteller" and research fellows; new GLAM newsletter; brief news
- Deletion controversy: Deletion of article about website angers gaming community
- WikiProject report: Talking with WikiProject Feminism
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: New case opened after interim desysop last week; two pending cases
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Romanian Wikinews - Mr. man
Hello, I'm a ro:wp and ro:wikinews administrator. About this discution, can you tell me if Mr. man is the same person with Ervinhoo or Memo 18. He behave like them but someone from ro:wp told me that ot cannot be verified because too much time has passed from 2010.Ionutzmovie 13:09, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
- You need to contact a local Checkuser to verify whether they are the same, but as you said, in this case, it won't help because Mr. man hasn't edited for over a year, and checkuser data is not available for a long time (only 3 months I think). Regards, Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 13:20, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
???
Why did you do this? mickit 18:04, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
- Oops! Sometimes the rollback button of one edit and the diff of another edit are too close, so I accidentally clicked it. Fail on my part. :P Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 18:07, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
- Then it's OK Actually, same thing happened to me from time to time. mickit 18:10, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
Crat flag
Hi there! I've granted you the crat flag. If you have any questions just ask me. -Barras 11:37, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks a lot, Barras. :) Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 12:23, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 14 March 2011
- News and notes: Foundation reports editor trends, technology plans and communication changes; brief news
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: New case on AE sanction handling; AUSC candidates; proposed decision in Kehrli 2 and Monty Hall problem
- Technology report: Left-aligned edit links and bugfixes abound; brief news
The Signpost: 21 March 2011
- WikiProject report: Medicpedia — WikiProject Medicine
- Features and admins: Best of the week
- Arbitration report: One closed case, one suspended case, and two other cases
The Signpost: 28 March 2011
- News and notes: Berlin conference highlights relation between chapters and Foundation; annual report; brief news
- In the news: Sue Gardner interviewed; Imperial College student society launched; Indian languages; brief news
- WikiProject report: Linking with WikiProject Wikify
- Features and admins: Featured list milestone
- Arbitration report: New case opens; Monty Hall problem case closes – what does the decision tell us?
The Signpost: 4 April 2011
- News and notes: 1 April activities; RIAA takedown notice; brief news
- Editor retention: Fighting the decline by restricting article creation?
- WikiProject report: Out of this world — WikiProject Solar System
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: AUSC appointments, new case, proposed decision for Coanda case, and motion regarding CU/OS
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
thank you
I thought I'm going to play the rollback game for ever. Matanya 17:20, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
- No problem. Happy to be of help. :) Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 17:24, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 11 April 2011
- Recent research: Research literature surveys; drug reliability; editor roles; BLPs; Muhammad debate analyzed
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Japan
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Two cases close - what does the Coanda decision tell us?
- Technology report: The Toolserver explained; brief news
The Signpost: 18 April 2011
- News and notes: Commons milestone; newbie contributions assessed; German community to decide on €200,000 budget; brief news
- In the news: Wikipedia accurate on US politics, plagiarized in court, and compared to Glass Bead Game; brief news
- WikiProject report: An audience with the WikiProject Council
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Case comes to a close after 3 weeks - what does the decision tell us?
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 25 April 2011
- News and notes: Survey of French Wikipedians; first Wikipedian-in-Residence at Smithsonian; brief news
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Somerset
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Request to amend prior case; further voting in AEsh case
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 2 May 2011
- News and notes: Picture of the Year voting begins; Internet culture covered in Sweden and consulted in Russia; brief news
- WikiProject report: The Physics of a WikiProject: WikiProject Physics
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Two new cases open – including Tree shaping case
- Technology report: Call for RTL developers, varied sign-up pages and news in brief
This Month in GLAM: April 2011
|