Misuse of checkuser privilegesEdit

Thank you for submitting this (I thought just clicking "thank" wasn't enough :) ). It is a very serious issue that might call for immediate Meta action - we'll discuss this soon, hopefully. GregorB (talk) 09:53, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[]

If I understand correctly: 1) there was an informal complaint against Croq, 2) Speedy investigated using CU tools, thus creating an entry in the CU log (this is still OK, right?), 3) Speedy said that, based on what he saw, the complaint was baseless, 4) upon subsequent CU run, it turns out the complaint was clearly not baseless? GregorB (talk) 13:08, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[]
I'm asking this because one way out for SG is to say vaguely that he had "checked", while he had merely taken a look at the edit histories or something like that. CU has a log, so these kinds of statements can be verified. Another way out for him is to say things have changed since his CU run, but that seems extremely implausible. Has anyone raised this issue on hr wiki (WP:ZM perhaps)? I see nothing happening. GregorB (talk) 15:08, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[]