SpBot archives all sections tagged with {{Section resolved|1=~~~~}} and sections whose most recent comment is older than 120 days. For the archive overview, see /Archives.

Proposal to set up multiple vote on Securepoll from zhwiki community edit

Hello, there was two votes created in the recent zhwiki election (one for the sysop and another one for the advanced permission). Currently, there is a proposal from some zhwiki community members that setting each vote per each candidate (similar to last year's election). I would like to ask if this is possible or not? And will this increase your workload excessively? :/ Thanks! SCP-2000 07:53, 8 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Sorry to bother you. Any update about this? Thanks:) SCP-2000 09:37, 2 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
Sorry to miss this. This would be possible but cumbersome. Ideally we would have one or two votes per cycle rather than 10+ :) but if it is the will of the community we can make it happen. Joe Sutherland (Wikimedia Foundation) (talk) 04:18, 14 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

RamzyM (WMF) edit

Good day, please remove the translation admin user right from the above staff. Despite repeated warnings to not reuse translation units, the same mistakes were made again today. I have doubts on the competence of the use of tools here. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 09:38, 24 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi - I guess you’re reaching out because I granted translation admin rights here. I'm one of the folks who respond to requests for admin rights sent to Trust and Safety. I see Ramzy’s manager has followed up with him about the error and I think he now understands the best practice for translation units - hopefully that resolves the concern. Joe Sutherland (Wikimedia Foundation) (talk) 22:58, 26 February 2024 (UTC)Reply