bg:Потребител беседа:Bggoldie

Molodovan/Romanian issues edit

Sorry pal, but you missed your point already, my advice is: when you don't know what you're talking about don't stick to it, get out! On the Molodovan/Romanian issues I definitely know better than you do. So, keep your mouth shut dude, or else I will accuse you of being Anti-Romanian. --Fratele lui Bonaparte, il cunosti? 05:43, 25 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Revert edit

No prob :-). He probably saw your subpage in the recent changes page. "Mumfum" is a known vandal (at least here on Meta). --.anaconda 19:24, 12 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Your votes edit

Your vote edit

Moved to Stewards/elections 2006-2#Pathoschild and answered there to keep the discussion in one place.
Feel free to read Anglo-American stewards. -- Goldie ± (talk) 09:59, 12 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Anti Anglo-American. edit

This is a unusual vote against me considering what I've done and where I've contributed. Essentially, you are voting against me because I'm American. Never mind that I contribute to other language Wikipedias, speak French fluently, have contributed toward the Haitian-Kreyol wikipedia. You're only reason for voting against me is because I am American. This seems bigoted. Bastique 20:23, 10 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Hi, Your anti-English Wikipedia POV is not appropriate in the steward vote. Please keep this kind of comments for you. Yann 14:54, 12 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Copied From Steward Election edit

Please accept my sincerest apologies (copied from the Steward election). As I mentioned to HillGentlman on his talk page, I was in shock that I was considered Anglo-American centric in spite of what I have accomplished on Wikimedia Commons in involving other language projects and cultures. Therefore, I apologize for my choice of words and regret that I cannot get you to change your mind. Bastique 15:41, 12 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Your rant on the steward election edit

POV pushing and opposing people who aren't even from the United States (especially Redux, whose native language is Portugese) simply because they have a near-native knowledge of English isn't going to get your point across. For example, what if there was an absolutely perfect candidate, whose native language, was, say, Japanese, but they were en-5, ko-4, and zh-3? Would you vote against them because they were en-5 and therefore must live in the Americas? --Coredesat (en.wp) 02:59, 13 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Discussion moved from election page edit

I've moved the following discussion from Stewards/elections 2006-2 and linked to it to keep both the election page and the discussion readable. I hope you don't mind. :) —{admin} Pathoschild 08:07, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

Yes, I do mind! You're supposed to be a public person, and identity verification is just tiny part of it. You'd better start adapting to flashlight life. -- Goldie ± (talk) 15:45, 14 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Why English-speaking stewards are evil? edit

Вы полагаете что значительное количество знатоков других языков позволит местной администрации противостоять всяким румынским синдромам, будет способствовать более эффективному разруливанию всяких молдаво-сибирско-белорусских скандалов? Мысль понятна, но вывод спорен. Много ли будет проку, если в связи с очередным "лингвистическим" скандалом среди стьюардов найдётся один, способный прочесть информацию на требуемом языке? Incnis Mrsi 00:37, 27 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Your account will be renamed edit

03:33, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed edit

19:56, 21 April 2015 (UTC)