Template:IEG/Criteria/es

This page is a translated version of the page Template:IEG/Criteria and the translation is 36% complete.

solicitantes elegibles

Personas o grupos de 4 individuos como máximo. Consulta otras opciones de financiamiento.

Dispuestos a proporcionar su nombre legal completo y dirección. Consultar más reglas del programa.

Capacidad de completar el proyecto de forma independiente.
Los beneficiarios no dispondrán de acceso especial a los grupos de ingeniería o desarrollo de producto de la fundación ni a otro personal no relacionado con el programa de asignación de subvenciones.

proyectos elegibles

Scoped to 6 months, with potential to renew for 6 more if need is shown.

Petición máxima USD 30,000. Ningún mínimo.

Aimed at improving one or more of Wikimedia's existing websites. Creating a new wiki instead?

Technical projects should be completed independently.

Development of templates, gadgets, bots, and standalone applications are welcome. Software projects requiring code review and integration must demonstrate commitment from the related maintainers.

Any code or other materials produced must be published and released as free and open-source.

Licensing should be compatible with current Wikimedia and MediaWiki practices.

Content-creation is not directly funded.


Projects should foster conditions that encourage editing by volunteers (e.g. editor recruitment campaigns), not replace volunteer action by funding someone to edit articles, upload photos, etc.

Criterios de selección de proyectos

We select proposals based on the following criteria:

  1. Impact potential - Does it fit with Wikimedia's strategic priorities? Does it have potential for online impact? Can it be sustained, scaled, or adapted elsewhere after the grant ends?

  2. Innovation and learning - Does it take an innovative approach to solving a key problem for the Wikimedia movement? Is the potential impact greater than the risks? Can we measure success?

  3. Ability to execute - Can the scope be accomplished in 6 months? How realistic/efficient is the budget? Do the participants have the necessary skills/experience?

  4. Community engagement - Does it have a specific target community within the Wikimedia movement, and plan to engage it often? Does it have community support? Does it support diversity?

  5. The total amount of funding available - annually approved by the WMF Board.