The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it.
Most likely, new comments will not be taken into account by the new three Working Group members in their work of developing the final Recommendations. You are free however to continue discussing in the spirit of "discussing about Wikipedia is a work in progress". :)
@The Land: Q9: The movement consists in the first place of online communities connected to Wikimedia projects. They are foremost the first to be involved in deciding about the future of the movement. The online communities are even't mentioned in deciding about this change. That is odd. I belief it is a prerequisite to have a movement charter or other such documents be ratified on each project by the online community through the decision making process of that online community. Please remember that none of the organizations/entities do represent the online communities. Ad Huikeshoven (talk) 11:39, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
Thanks Ad Huikeshoven! For us the creation and ratification of the charter would be part of the next step, the implementation. Our idea was to have something like a "constitutional assembly" that consists of representatives of all relevant stakeholders (from the projects as well as the affiliates) to create the charter. --CDG (WMAT staff) (talk) 21:23, 11 October 2019 (UTC)