Talk:Small wiki audit/audits

Note

I had no opinion whether the audit or whatsoever should be here, my edits saying "making it better" is at least the categories aren't transcluded nor the page doesn't look too long (cosmetic purposes as well as functional purpose). I had no intent to sweep into whether the audit is called an audit or not or should the text be here or not. Feel free to revert my edits if not appropriate. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 16:36, 26 September 2020 (UTC)

The audit itself was done through the small wiki audit; however, the rfc that has been opened based on the audit is now separate from it, so I would think it is appropriate to link the audit itself while not linking the rfc and discussion of it. While there have been some qualms about the quality of the process of the audit, it was nonetheless organized as a small wiki audit. Zoozaz1 (talk) 16:49, 26 September 2020 (UTC)