Talk:Non-compliant site coordination
Request for comment edit
As I'm not too clued up and don't have lots of Internet connectivity, I ask for help: I notice http://hallencyclopedia.com/ and the Afrikaans http://ensiklopedie.com (a link was added to the Afrikaans article. At the site the following is added to the copyright notice: "All rights reserved". I'm not very knowledgable about copyright and the GFDL, but is this ok? Furthermore I see some included text in a side bar (I checked http://ensiklopedie.com/Chemie, for example) which according to my understanding must be licenced under the GFDL too. Can someone follow this up or provide some insight? --Alias 21:10, 2 Dec 2004 (UTC)
What is the difference between this page and en:Wikipedia:Mirrors and forks? In particular en:Wikipedia:Mirrors_and_forks/GFDL_Compliance#Low seems to cover all of this and much more(?)... \Mike 11:50, 2005 Feb 21 (UTC)
Seems to be an endless supply of noncompliant sites edit
If you google an excerpt from almost any WP article, and exclude results that contain the word "wikipedia", you come up with at least a half dozen sites, most using the content for search engine optimization, and they seem to be multiplying. Tracking these all down could be a huge job, and is probably not something that anyone is especially excited about taking on. There has got to be a better way to go about this.... -- 24.215.177.234 17:43, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
Mi-cuba.de.ki edit
Obviously the violations are only fixed page by page. I reverted the deletion of the violation and gave the example page "Zigarren". A few minutes later this page was edited and the license was added (see "Letztes Update ( Wednesday, 03 January 2007 )" at the bottom of the page. --88.76.215.66 11:56, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
- A short period of time after I wrote this, the note "Letztes Update ( Wednesday, 03 January 2007 )" at the bottom of the page has been deleted. --88.76.215.66 13:12, 3 January 2007 (UTC)