"but not at the English Wikipedia" edit

Is it used on any Wikipedias? PiRSquared17 (talk) 17:08, 20 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

It is used on mediawiki.org and translatewiki.net. I'm not sure about any other wikis.--Jorm (WMF) (talk) 17:14, 20 May 2013 (UTC)Reply
That bit should probably be cut from the meta wiki page.--Jorm (WMF) (talk) 17:14, 20 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

New Version of the Flow Prototype Released edit

A new version of the Flow Prototype has been released. Please read the release notes here. This version has many changes, not the least of which is that it approaches full functionality.--Jorm (WMF) (talk) 21:26, 13 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Flow was just renamed to "Structured Discussions" edit

As if discussions on talk pages are not structured, the WMF in it’s infinite wisdom just decided to rename Flow to mw:Structured Discussions, the official ratio is this:

Structured Discussion was formerly known as “Flow”. Flow was a bigger project that has been re-scoped to focus on user-to-user discussions. The software has been renamed to reflect this change.

They fail to see the difference between a structure and bondage gear. And they obviously hate flexibility. Could someone of the culprits for this misnomer please fix the wrong links? I'm not interested to help this dead project in any way. Grüße vom Sänger ♫(Reden) 12:56, 15 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

{{ping|Flow-Acolytes}} One week ago, and on your own Wiki still no change? Will the misleading name finally be changed again to something more NPOV? Grüße vom Sänger ♫(Reden) 16:24, 21 September 2017 (UTC)Reply
Return to "Flow" page.