Talk:Empowering Italian GLAMs/Criteria for assessment and evaluation

Policy

I would check also where is policy. if it is online, if the license is clearly indicated, if it is a standard license, if the term and conditions are coherent with the open access policy... iopensa (talk) 07:21, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Content (also in the policy formulation)

I would not limit the focus to digital reproduction of public domain works. The open access policy can be applied to images, texts, videos, conferences, educational resources, research, publications, the websites... iopensa (talk) 07:23, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Accessibility - Quantity

It would make sense to understand if content in open access are 10% of the digital content of the institutions or the 70% (which I would consider the maximum). maybe we can consider several categories: 0 (nothing); < 2% (something); 2%-10% (a collection), 10%-50% (several collections); 50%-70% (large part of the collections); >70% (everything) iopensa (talk) 07:26, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Accessibility - examples of platforms

I would add explicit examples of platforms such as the Wikimedia projects and I would provide information about the kind of platforms they are (proprietary, open and libre software, terms and conditions of the platforms). People think that facebook, google arts, wikimedia, zenodo, academia, youtube, peertube are just different platforms: they don't properly understand the differences. it is important to clarify they difference and make them evident iopensa (talk) 07:31, 10 April 2023 (UTC)