Strategy/Wikimedia movement/2018-20/Frequently asked questions

Translate this page; This page contains changes which are not marked for translation.
Other languages:
Bahasa Melayu • ‎Deutsch • ‎English • ‎dansk • ‎español • ‎français • ‎português do Brasil • ‎العربية • ‎فارسی • ‎हिन्दी • ‎中文 • ‎日本語
Want to help translate? Translate the missing messages.

BasicsEdit

What is Wikimedia 2030?Edit

When Wikipedia marked 15 years in 2016, we as a movement began to think about the future and what we want to build or achieve by 2030. Out of this, a participatory and adaptive process was brought to life to define what Wikimedia will look like in 2030, and how we want our projects, our communities, and the free knowledge ecosystem to evolve.

The Movement Strategy Process “Wikimedia 2030” started in 2017. The first objective was to create a structure for this process and develop a cohesive direction to guide the movement going forward. Global community discussions were coordinated by a core strategy team and a Community Process Steering Committee to create this shared vision for the future. In October 2017, the movement’s strategic direction was finalized and endorsed: By 2030, Wikimedia will become the essential infrastructure of the ecosystem of free knowledge, and anyone who shares our vision will be able to join us. The strategic direction is driven by two objectives: Knowledge as a service and knowledge equity. Now, in the ongoing process, we are exploring our path to get there.

What is the Movement Strategy Process 2018-20?Edit

The Movement Strategy Process “Wikimedia 2030” brings together members of our movement to define how to best advance in our strategic direction. To do this, we are assessing where the movement currently stands and where challenges may lie so that we can identify and seize opportunities that support our strategic direction and develop recommendations for change within the movement‘s structures. As part of this, discussions and analysis will take place on a global level to develop a plan for change that:

  • is built on sustainability, inclusivity, and diversity
  • ensures the movement makes the most of all potential opportunities
  • pinpoints existing and possible challenges and best practices to overcome these
  • identifies the tools, methods, resources, and structural changes that are needed in order to ensure effective implementation of recommended changes

What does the Movement Strategy Process involve?Edit

Our goal is big: Becoming the essential infrastructure of the ecosystem of free knowledge by 2030 requires a deep analysis of where things are at and bold ideas to progress in our strategic direction. How can we adapt our structures to ensure our movement is future ready? What are the biggest opportunities that could drive this evolution? This is what inspires the work of the Movement Strategy Process.

Broadly speaking, the Movement Strategy Process consists of: analyzing the current situation of our movement, developing recommendations for change, and implementing those recommendations.

From July 2018 to November 2019, the process itself rotated around the work of nine working groups, each focused on a specific thematic area that is essential in the movement structure. The groups facilitated discussion, research, and analysis of their thematic area to help the movement answer important questions.

The initial focus is to define a scope of inquiry, aka a set of guiding questions, that will act as a framework for identifying the necessary changes at the movement’s structural level. The answers that the scope yields will be used to decide what changes to implement and how to move forward.

From here, the groups analyzed the movement at a deeper level than ever before. As part of this, dedicated discussions with the broader community took place online and in-person. The community input enriched the groups’ work with diverse perspectives and helped ensure that everything from analysis to recommendations drafting is well informed with what Movement Strategy means in various local contexts.

With two draft iterations, the nine working groups produced 89 recommendations. They concluded their work and dissolved at the beginning of November 2019. From here, a smaller team (made up of former working group members) worked to consolidate the 89 recommendations into one coherent set. This coherent set of recommendations will be presented to the broader Wikimedia movement and the Board of Trustees in early 2020 for review and consideration.

The broader community, experts, and key stakeholders will be brought in at particular points to keep these discussions well informed and enriched with diverse perspectives.

The working groups and overall process are supported by a core strategy team that provides guidance for everyone involved and ensures the process is relevant, collaborative, open, and focused on outcomes.

What are the desired outcomes of the Movement Strategy Process?Edit

The goal is to develop concrete recommendations for how we can evolve and develop structurally in defined thematic areas in order to advance in our strategic direction.

Regular input from communities, movement stakeholders, organized groups, and experts will help ensure that the recommendations are actionable, that they have widespread support, and that the significant legal, financial and structural aspects and implications have all been considered.

What is the Movement Strategy Process timeline?Edit

Status January 2020: The Movement Strategy Process was initiated in 2017. The development of the scope took place from July 2018 until March 2019, and a first draft of recommendations for change was published in August 2019 for community input, including in-person discussions at Wikimania.

This input, alongside research and external expertise, was used to refine the draft recommendations further. At the same time, individuals from different working groups started to work on turning the nine sets of recommendations into one coherent set. Representatives of each working group came together in Tunis, Tunisia in September 2019 to identify overlaps in the content produced by the nine groups and use these to harmonize the recommendations. The goal had been to produce a draft harmonized set by the end of the meeting in Tunis. An initial draft grouping of the recommendations was produced, but it became clear during the event that before it’s possible to create a coherent and actionable set of recommendations, fundamental principles that underpin the path towards 2030 needed to be formalized. This began happening at the meeting in Tunis.

During October 2019, working groups put the final touches on their draft recommendations, 89 in total. The nine working groups were dissolved at the beginning of November 2019. From here, a smaller group of people (who were previously working group members) signed on to take the work on principles forward and continue to create one coherent set of recommendations.

This synthesized, coherent set will be published here in January 2020 for community review. This set of recommendations will also be presented to the Board of Trustees. A following set will be presented to the movement at the end of March 2020, in the lead up to Wikimedia Summit. This set will also be presented to the Board at the same time.

The organized part of the movement will have a chance to discuss the recommendations and implementation in depth at the Wikimedia Summit, which takes place from April 3 to 5, 2020.The event will first aim to create clarity and shared understanding of the recommendations, and then initiate the implementation across movement organizations in a collaborative way.

Conversations around implementation of the changes will kick off at the Wikimedia Summit in April 2020. At this event, Affiliates and the Wikimedia Foundation meet to start prioritizing, sequencing and coordinating responsibilities to implement the recommendations across the movement. The Movement Strategy Core Team will hand over the work and knowledge of the previous two years to a new implementation structure to coordinate the work going forward.

You can find more info on the dedicated Timeline page.

Working GroupsEdit

What is the role of the working groups?Edit

Working groups are the heart and soul of the Movement Strategy Process, and they have driven the discussions for structural reform across the movement. Over 90 members of the global Wikimedia community have formed into nine working groups, each one analyzing a specific thematic area within the movement. The results of their analyses will form the basis for developing recommendations for structural change.

Working groups have played three important roles:

  1. Identify and monitor trends in their respective thematic area and assess their relevance and impact to the Wikimedia Movement.
  2. Develop structural recommendations for the movement in general and for diverse stakeholders (affiliates, WMF, communities and allies) in particular.
  3. Work closely with a range of community members throughout the process in an effort to develop recommendations and inclusive implementation plans for these recommendations.

The nine thematic areas that the working groups researched and developed recommendations for are: Advocacy, Capacity Building, Community Health, Diversity, Product and Technology, Partnerships, Resource Allocation, Revenue Streams, and Roles and Responsibilities.

Where can I access the working groups’ work?Edit

The guiding questions of the scope, draft recommendations, analysis and deliberations during the process, research and case studies, reading materials and working group reports will be documented on Meta, available for both analysis and discussion.

The minutes of the meetings, decisions made, and action items will be published with the consent of the working group members on each group’s Meta page.

How often did the working groups meet?Edit

The frequency of meetings varied from group to group as the working groups determined their own scheduling. The groups relied on an asynchronous workflow, allowing them to meet online, collaborate, and manage common documents and workloads remotely. Each working group member committed to a time investment of five hours per week.

How were the members of the working groups selected?Edit

Each working group consisted of around 8 to 15 people and featured a mix of volunteers, Wikimedia staff, and Board members from different backgrounds and regions. In mid-2018, an open call for applications was put out to the Wikimedia community to join the working groups. 172 applications were evaluated by the core team and a shortlist was created for the Steering Committee. The Steering Committee - assembled by the core team from members of the broader movement who were involved in Phase I of the Movement Strategy Process - finalized the selection of working group members.

For more details and analysis of the overall applications, please refer to the Application process report here.

What was the proportional makeup of the working groups in terms of the number of volunteers, staff, and Board members?Edit

The working group membership structure roughly breaks down like so: 30% volunteers, 40% staff, 30% Board members.

The distribution of applications was relatively even between staff, board members, and volunteers. When forming the working groups, other factors were considered in addition to applicant roles, such as expertise, geography and also gender identity, in order to ensure a diverse, well-rounded group makeup and help us strike the right balance in group membership.

Have you considered paying volunteers to contribute to the working groups?Edit

Requests to pay volunteers for their contributions to the working groups have been brought to the core team’s attention. In line with Wikimedia’s overall model for voluntary contribution, volunteers will not receive payment for their input into the working groups.

What is the Steering Group?Edit

To facilitate a smooth flow of information between the different working groups, a Steering Group was set up, featuring select representatives (called coordinators) from each working group. The Steering Group met on a biweekly basis together with the core team to share experience and discuss updates that are relevant to all working groups. You can find more info on the Steering Group here.

Writing GroupEdit

What is the role of the writing group?Edit

Writers took on the sense-making and synthesis of the 89 recommendations developed by the nine thematic area working groups into one coherent set. This was based around overlapping themes and converging functions found in the content. In the process of drafting principles and synthesizing recommendations, writers took incoming information into account, such as new and existing conversations with the movement, and reports from earlier phases of the process. Writers used the overlaps that have been identified in the recommendations to synthesize multiple recommendations and put forward ideas for changes within our structures that would address these.

Movement Strategy Process - Synthesizing 89 recommendations into one set. Oct 2019 to Jan 2020

How were the writing group members selected?Edit

The writing group is comprised of former working group members. In October 2019, the core team asked all working group members to signal whether they were able or would be interested in continuing to work on the recommendations after the working groups dissolved. 15 people signed up to be writers. You can find more information about the group here.

How often does the writing group meet?Edit

As with the working groups, the writing group adopted an asynchronous workflow. They have been meeting online approximately once per week from November to January and they collaborate on the synthesized set of recommendations online and remotely. To help advance their work, members of the writing group came together in person in Berlin in December 2019 for five days. In the lead up to closing their work, 3 final writers volunteered to review the document for layout and for editorial overview. They conducted daily calls and extensive asynchronous work over Dec. 30 to Jan. 4

ParticipantsEdit

How can I participate?Edit

See the How can I contribute? Where are conversations happening? section and the Community Conversations section below.

When and how can communities get involved in the Movement Strategy Process?Edit

Insight and perspectives from across the broader Wikimedia community is a vital element of the Movement Strategy Process. There are a number of ways community members can take part:

Join our Community Conversations: During our Community Conversations, community members can provide direct input into particular aspects of the Movement Strategy Process via multiple formats. Initial Community Conversations were held from April to October 2019. A next round of Community Conversations will be held starting in January 2020.

Members of several language communities will also act as Community Strategy Liaisons, managing the flow of information between their language community and the Movement Strategy Process. You can connect with them to stay up to date on news and also share your thoughts about the Process.

Do you have other ideas for getting involved in the Movement Strategy Process? Contact the core team!

What role can organized groups (affiliates, Wikimedia Foundation, movement partners, committees) play in the Movement Strategy Process?Edit

Organized groups are encouraged to actively engage in the Movement Strategy Process. They have been invited to appoint strategy liaisons who will be the point of contact between organized groups and the Movement Strategy Process. The liaisons will facilitate a two-way dialogue that brings the perspective and context of the organized groups into these global discussions.

Community Conversations (general information)Edit

What are Movement Strategy Community Conversations? Who participates in them?Edit

Movement strategy community conversations are discussions from volunteers, affiliates, and other stakeholders across the Wikimedia movement about our shared future. These take place in both on- and offline formats. The purpose is for everyone to have a voice as we work together to achieve our Wikimedia 2030 vision: becoming the essential infrastructure of the ecosystem of free knowledge.

These conversations began in March 2019 after the Working Groups released Scoping Documents at the Wikimedia Summit. From March to August, communities gave feedback about what range of topics and what recommendations they hoped would drive movement change. At Wikimania and through September 2019, the 9 thematic working groups presented 89 draft recommendations for public comment and review. These drafts were at a very early stage and gave the community an opportunity to share substantive input that shaped which recommendations were kept, changed, eliminated, or tabled for future use.

From September to December 2019, working group members consolidated across themes into groups of writers, connectors, and reviewers. Writers worked particularly hard to synthesize work across working groups, as well as community input, over many weeks and an in-person meeting in Berlin. By early January 2020, they produced a coherent set of draft recommendations that is now being shared publicly for a final round of community input. Now is our time as a global community to understand the recommendations and share our feedback about how they would impact our communities.

What is the difference between “open discussions” and “strategy salons”?Edit

Open discussions are a period of broad consultation where organized groups of our movement and members of our various language communities (in other words, anyone active on any Wikimedia project, online or offline, in any language) can enrich the conversations with their perspective on what structures and systems they would like to see changed or preserved as we design the next 15 years of our movement. During this period, we encourage you to share thoughts across as many working group themes or areas of interest as you feel comfortable.

Many organized groups and communities will also use this period as a chance to spread awareness about the movement strategy process and help people understand the importance of sharing their perspective. For both of these purposes, open conversations will take place in a variety of formats, including on-wiki, on social media channels, over conference calls, and occasionally in-person. Most open discussion events and conversations will result in notes collected by the organizer and shared back with the Core Team so that they can be summarized together and sent to the working groups.

Strategy salons build off of our work in open discussions by enabling organized groups and some regional Wikimedia communities the opportunity to meet in person and have more focused discussions around one to three working group themes. Most strategy salons were 2-5 hour meetings hosted by affiliate groups with their community members and a few external partners. In a few instances, some regional groups hosted 1-3 day events that brought in community members from a wider geographic region that otherwise might not have had the opportunity to discuss movement strategy together. You can read more about the strategy salons, including reports, here.

How will the Community Conversations feed into the working groups?Edit

Community Conversations will be monitored throughout the process. From March to September 2019, the Core Team created monthly summary documents of the notes shared by affiliate representatives and Strategy Liaisons and presented them to the working groups. From there, the working groups reviewed and considered the new inputs as they drafted recommendations to be shared with the public. If the working groups had additional questions to the communities, they reached out with follow-up questions and specifications to fully understand the local context. The aim of the community conversations is to enrich the discussions and inform the recommendations about the local needs and contexts.

How will the Community Conversations in January feed into the writing group and the synthesized recommendations document?Edit

Please refer to our dedicated FAQs section on the Movement Strategy Community Conversations in early 2020 below.

How can I or my group participate in Strategy salons?Edit

Strategy salons were strategy-focused events held by recognized Wikimedia affiliates to host in-person gatherings to discuss movement strategy. The strategy salon application process has closed and all strategy salons were held between June and September 2019.

You can read more about the strategy salons, including reports, here.

What are the working groups doing, more specifically, with community input?Edit

From April to September 2019, the working groups main focus was taking in external information, primarily from Community Conversations, but also through targeted research, to enrich their thinking and draft recommendations which were then shared publicly for community input. This included having working group members meet with the community at Wikimania (August 14-18, 2019) to receive feedback on early recommendation drafts.

In September 2019, working groups began turning their recommendations into one coherent set. To help them, they reviewed community input on the draft recommendations and used this, where applicable, to adapt or refine their recommendations. Community strategy liaisons provided extensive support for this process, by producing summaries of community content, by joining calls with writers, and by providing direct input into the writing process of the synthesized recommendations.

In November, the writing group started taking this synthesis work forward. The writers have continued the close collaboration with the Strategy Liaisons to help integrate relevant community input where applicable. This synthesized set of recommendations will be published for community review in early 2020.

What is the role of Strategy Liaisons in all of this?Edit

Strategy Liaisons act as a bridge between their organized group or language community and the movement strategy process. Their purpose is to help make sure their organized group or language community understands the strategy process and has rich opportunities to discuss and share the changes they would like to see in the structures of our movement in 9 chosen thematic areas.

With this in mind, there are currently two types of Strategy Liaisons. Organizational Strategy Liaisons are volunteers who represent specific organized groups or affiliates, and lead conversations within those groups. Community Strategy Liaisons are part-time hired contractors who lead conversations in target languages (currently Arabic, German, Portuguese, Spanish, Hindi, and French) across all Wikimedia projects. The two groups operate in parallel, but also lean on each other for support and ideas in facilitating movement strategy discussions within their constituencies.

Movement Strategy Community Conversations in Early 2020Edit

What is the timeframe for all of this?Edit

Community Conversations Timeline, January to March 2020

This final round of community conversations will begin on January 20th and last through the first week of March.

The first five weeks are for open community discussion about the latest recommendations. During this time period the Core Team will provide support to online communities and affiliate liaisons to facilitate conversations in their own languages. A team of contracted Community Strategy Liaisons will work specifically with online and affiliate communities who operate in Arabic, French, Spanish, Portuguese, German, and Hindi. There will also be some targeted support for English speaking communities. Finally, Strategy Liaisons for affiliates or other online language communities will also receive support for facilitating conversations on their own channels.

After the first five weeks, the movement strategy Core Team will take a one week break to summarize all community input and reflect it back in a short, public report. Wikimedians are welcome to continue commenting and discussing during this time, but the discussions will not be as closely facilitated and documented. The community will then have one week to suggest changes to the posted summary so that it accurately reflects their viewpoints. Under direction from the Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation, a group consisting of staff, Core Team and writers will produce any final revisions.

What stage are the recommendations in?Edit

The recommendations are now nearing finalization. For now, there will be no new recommendations added, and ideas that the community feels are important that are not included in the current text can be raised during the next phase - Implementation - which begins later in 2020. Ideas that receive broad community support will continue on into the final strategy document, and those that have broad resistance will be considered for alteration.

What is the goal of this round of movement strategy community conversations? What can actually change at this point?Edit

In short, the goal of this round of movement strategy community conversations is to identify which ideas should go forward as they are and which may need to be modified. This is not a process of voting, but we do want to gauge honestly and transparently how different groups feel about the recommendations, and in particular, how they think they would be affected by the prescribed changes. This feedback will be given consideration by the Board of Trustees in the shaping of the final recommendations draft.

Is this really relevant for independent online contributors?Edit

Some of the recommendations are more relevant for the organizational, affiliate-or WMF-driven sections of the movement, while some will have more of an impact for project-based communities and individual contributors. However, all parts of our Movement gathered around this process and contributed in various capacities - individual contributors, affiliates, chapters, user groups, Wikimedia Foundation and the Board of Trustees - so we could have a coherent set of recommendations that will guide us along towards the Strategic Direction and its objectives. For help navigating the content, reach out to your Strategy Liaison or ask us a question on the recommendations talk page.

What is different now (January-March 2020) from what we did last year (March-September 2019)?Edit

Last year, movement strategy community conversations were much broader in scope. We openly gathered ideas on a variety of topics to shape the content of recommendations in an open way, and later, to help synthesize the 89 draft recommendations into a more streamlined set.

Our current process is more limited in scope but not in importance. The recommendations have been consolidated into a coherent set of 13 ideas - and we want to know what you think, particularly how these proposed changes would impact you and what risks or benefits you see in adopting them. This is the final round of community input for this stage of the movement strategy process.

For more information, see Question 5.1.

How can I contribute? Where are conversations happening?Edit

Conversations are happening on and off wiki in a large number of places. Most centrally, we encourage discussion on the Meta talk pages for each recommendation. We have Strategy Liaisons supporting these conversations in English, German, Portuguese, French, Spanish, Hindi, and Arabic.

Many of our largest online project communities are also hosting discussions on their own pages, as well as social media and other relevant channels. Here’s where you can join on-wiki:

Finally, many affiliates are leading discussions on their own in-person or virtual channels, and summaries of these discussions will be reflected on Meta in English. If you don't wish to post your thoughts in a public forum, you can email your feedback on the recommendations to the Core Team via this address: strategy2030(at)wikimedia.org.

What is the best way to use and review the recommendations? How are they being translated?Edit

We have prepared a variety of ways for the movement to engage with the recommendations.

The strategic recommendations document will be available in English, Arabic, French, German, Hindi, Portuguese, and Spanish. This 20-page document contains the introduction, narrative of change, underlying principles, 13 recommendations, and process overview. This is the version that will be sent to the Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees for review and will be concurrently made available on Meta.

A cover note will also be available in Catalan, Dutch, Farsi, Hebrew, Polish, and Russian.

The expanded version of the recommendations and rationale and contains full footnotes linking to community input and the strategic directions that shaped this work. It contains extended text regarding the 13 recommendations and the underlying principles and reasoning for each element in greater detail. It is currently available in English.

After this round of movement strategy community conversations has been completed and the final recommendations document has been produced, the expanded version will be updated or revised as necessary and then translated into Spanish, French, Arabic, Hindi, Portuguese, and German and posted on Meta.

What about all the feedback I gave before? How has it been used?Edit

All community feedback gathered through facilitated conversations by Strategy Liaisons and at conferences and strategy salons across the world were reflected in a series of summary reports, which represented all new information gathered that month. You can also view reports for individual strategy salons and conferences here.

Between October and December 2019, Strategy Liaisons analyzed the feedback according to key themes relevant to the recommendations and shared community input with the writers responsible for working on the recommendations. Now, the community input, as well as the results of the community survey, will be reflected in footnotes in the recommendations documents. Fuller descriptions of the community feedback are also available in the Community Input Summaries links on each recommendation’s Meta page.

Lastly, we are in the process of publishing a series of blog posts on Wikimedia Space and on meta that summarize and reflect the key ideas we have heard from the community. You can find the links to the blogs and discussion pages in the table below.

Thematic Summaries Language Community Summaries
Resource Allocation (still to come)

Revenue Streams (still to come)

Partnerships

Capacity Building

Community Health (still to come)

Roles & Responsibilities (still to come)

Product & Technology

Diversity (still to come)

Advocacy (still to come)

French - blog (French), discussion (French), blog (English), discussion (English)
Hindi - blog (Hindi), discussion (Hindi), blog (English), discussion (English)
Spanish - blog (Spanish), discussion (Spanish), blog (English), discussion (English)
Portuguese - blog (Portuguese), discussion (Portuguese), blog (English), discussion (English)
Arabic - blog (Arabic), discussion (Arabic), blog (English), discussion (English)

What are the next steps after Movement Strategy Community Conversations finish?Edit

Open, facilitated community conversations about the first version of the movement strategy recommendations run until February 21.

Here are the planned next steps once the community conversations period ends:

  • Week commencing February 24: the core team will spend this week summarizing all the feedback received and prepare a short report that provides an overview of community input. You are welcome to continue commenting and discussing during this time, but the discussions will not be as closely facilitated and documented.
  • Week commencing March 2: the core team will publish the above summary report on Meta to give communities an opportunity to review it the report and give feedback as to whether it accurately reflects their input from the community conversations. The closing date for this is March 6. This report will then be finalized and published as a summary of community input.

In mid-March, the feedback from the Board of Trustees, movement conversations, and reviewers input will be considered in the creation of the final, improved set of recommendations. A rationale for things that have not been considered will be provided, too. The integration group will consist of ~6 former working group members, core team members, as well as Katherine Maher and Ryan Merkley. Every participant will take part in discussions, content development, and actual writing. The core team is still putting in place the exact details of this, however, here is what we are currently planning:

  • The team will meet in person for the integration meeting in New York from March 10 to 12 to advance this work
  • Together, we will improve the language so that it is more clear and easier to translate.
  • We will review all community feedback (this has already started). If we see that there is widespread support for particular changes to be made to a recommendation or area of content, or non-controversial suggestions for improvement, we will make the respective adjustments.
  • There are some topics or recommendations that would have a different impact in different contexts, including for online communities and the organized part of the movement. This means that the feedback here may be quite mixed, as what works in one setting may not work in another. These will be considered in more detail when developing implementation plans.

The core team's aim is to have the recommendations finalized and published in late March.

RecommendationsEdit

When will recommendations be ready?Edit

Please see the Recommendations page for the latest version of the recommendations.

An initial, draft set of recommendations was published by each working group in August 2019, prior to Wikimania. Feedback gathered at Wikimania, in person at strategy salons, as well as online, alongside external research was integrated in the draft recommendations. In total, the working groups produced 89 draft recommendations over two iterations based on feedback and consultations. Starting in November 2019, these recommendations were consolidated and synthesized to create one coherent set.

This set will be shared publicly and presented to the movement as well as the Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees in January 2020. The feedback about this will be given consideration in the shaping of the final recommendations draft, which will be published and presented to the Board of Trustees and to the movement in late March 2020.

The path to the recommendations The scope of each working group’s analysis was defined and finalized in March, outlining a set of questions that guide research into our movement. The working groups spent the time following the Wikimedia Summit deep in analysis work and putting recommendations for structural change on paper. An initial draft of recommendations was published in August 2019 prior to Wikimania. These were published on Meta for communities to do an initial review of them online. Beyond this, working group representatives hosted dedicated sessions at Wikimania 2019 to discuss the draft recommendations and seek input in person.

Following this, the groups worked on refining their recommendations based on input they gathered on the drafts, both at Wikimania and online. This input includes both ideas from the communities as well as perspectives from experts beyond the movement who have dealt with change processes or certain aspects of it.

From here, the focus has been on harmonizing and synthesizing the recommendations. This means that some working group members, and from November 2019, writing group members, work together to develop one coherent set of recommendations that encompasses the work of all nine working groups. A synthesized et of recommendations will be presented to the movement as well as the Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation in January 2020.

Can I already get an idea of what the recommendations will be?Edit

Please see the latest version of the recommendations here. Another way to see what kinds of topics are being discussed within the movement strategy, we encourage you to read the scoping documents that each working group published in March 2019. These outline a set of questions that each group used to analyze the movement and identify which changes may be necessary on a structural level.

How will feedback on the recommendations be collected?Edit

Feedback on the draft recommendations is collected in a variety of ways.

One of the first opportunities where this happened was in person at Wikimania in August 2019. Several working group members were present to engage with the movement about their draft recommendations and get feedback.

Community conversations focusing on the initial draft recommendations were also held throughout August and September. In early 2020, the Wikimedia community will also have an opportunity to review the synthesized set of recommendations, which will be a refined, consolidated version of the initial drafts, the result of the nine individual sets of recommendations being turned into one coherent whole. These discussions will take place on a diverse range of platforms (both on- and offline). During this time, the movement will be encouraged to share their views and perspectives on the recommendations and the impact these may have in their local context.

How will feedback be incorporated into the recommendations?Edit

Feedback will be assessed and, where applicable, integrated into recommendations on an ongoing basis. This process started as soon as the initial draft recommendations were published in early August. Working groups took the initial feedback received during community conversations and Wikimania in August and used it to refine their draft recommendations.

Community conversations focusing on the initial set of draft recommendations then continued throughout September. During community conversations, the Information and Knowledge Management team also collaborated with the working groups to ensure that all impressions, insights, feedback, and data was made available to them, who then integrated the community input as applicable and closed feedback loops where necessary.

In early 2020, the synthesized version of the recommendations will be published and presented to the community for review. The goal is to reach a common understanding that the recommendations will help us move forward as a movement. Of particular interest is to find out what impact these recommendations may have in different contexts, where opportunities or challenges may lie, and, most importantly, whether these align with our strategic direction. As part of this, ideas that should go forward and those that may need to be modified will be identified through broad movement consultations. This feedback will be given consideration in the shaping of the final recommendations draft.

Please note, while all feedback will be reviewed and considered when refining the recommendations, not all the specifics of all feedback may be taken forward and integrated into the recommendations. Please see the following question for more details.

Will all feedback be incorporated into the recommendations?Edit

All the feedback will be considered as a whole when finalizing the recommendations to ensure that they reflect the perspectives of the wider movement as much as possible. However, not all the details of all feedback may be taken forward. The reasons for this may vary. Some of the input provided might be contradictory across the diverse range of stakeholders and communities within our movement; it might not be consistent with the movement's values, the strategic direction, law and other compliance requirements, or with the general direction of other recommendations; or it may be inconsistent or lack clarity of rationale. All input, however, will be well documented and made available for the implementation phase.

How will decisions be made about the implementation of recommendations?Edit

We are aiming to get a sense that movement stakeholders - online communities, affiliates, WMF, the Board of Trustees - agree that the recommendations are headed in the right direction and that they can move forward into implementation.

The recommendations will influence the movement on various levels (global, regional, and local). This means that different approaches in relation to decision-making may be required for different contexts. The Board of Trustees and the organizational side of the movement will play a big, collaborative role in developing and co-designing implementation. First steps toward this will take place at the Wikimedia Summit (April 3 to 5, 2020 in Berlin); see next question. Concrete decisions around implementation will be made during the implementation phase and will occur in context, as one approach may not fit all.

For some recommendations, implementation cannot immediately start, as they will require additional research or development, others may require additional consultation.

Please note that the Core Team’s mandate ends at the end of June, and does not include planning or executing the implementation phase. Ryan Merkley as the WMF Chief of Staff is taking the design and planning for this phase forward.

Please note: The working groups and the writing group themselves are not decision-making bodies. Where possible, they have articulated in the recommendations their ideas for how decision making should happen.

You can also read more about the Board of Trustees’ role in the Movement Strategy Process here.

What steps will take place in the next few months to put a decision-making process in place?Edit

The current focus of the movement strategy process is to get to a level of common understanding that the recommendations are the right ones to help us move forward and are in line with our strategic direction.

The first discussions on implementation will happen at the Wikimedia Summit (April 3 to 5, 2020 in Berlin). Here, participants will go into the recommendations in depth and start to develop a plan for how to make decisions around implementation. They will begin looking at prioritization and sequencing of recommendation implementation.

Designing implementation will be a collaborative process and will engage a wide range of stakeholders to enable them to take ownership of implementation in their own context and to ensure that the measures have impact and are applicable.

Is the decision of the Board of Trustees or any other body binding for all?Edit

Status as of January 2020: The movement strategy core team is working to determine the answer to this question. We will update this section as soon as possible.

To read more about the Board of Trustees’ role in the movement strategy here.  

Where can I find the latest news about the Movement Strategy Process?Edit

The core team will publish regular blog posts (a minimum of one a month) on Meta offering the latest updates and reports or presentations on the process. We will also send monthly community updates via the Wikimedia-l mailing list.

Beyond this, liaisons for both communities and organized groups are in place to help facilitate the flow of information and ensure news is conveyed to each.