Requests for new languages/Wikiversity Gilaki

Gilaki WikiversityEdit

main page Requests for new languages (Wikiversity Gilaki)
submitted verification final decision
  This language has been verified as eligible.
The language is eligible for a project, which means that the subdomain can be created once there is an active community and a localized interface, as described in the language proposal policy. You can discuss the creation of this language project on this page.
Proposal summary
  • Language details: Gilaki (گیلکی, glk ISO 639-3)
  • Editing community: AminSanaei (NP), varg(N), Parthava (N/mzn)
    List your user name if you're interested in editing the wiki. Add "N" next to your
    name if you are a native speaker of this language.
  • Relevant pages: Wikiversity Gilaki Beta
  • External links:
Please read the handbook for requesters for help using this template correctly.

Arguments in favourEdit

  1. Strong support-- we whant to have Gilaki Wikiversity.--AminSanaei 09:09, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
  2. Support --Ali 13:11, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
    Simple votes will be ignored in accordance with the Language proposal policy. Crochet.david 08:35, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
    Simple vote? Are you sure you saw my argument below? --Ali 13:58, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
    Here, it's the vote, there it's the discussion, a discussion may be not a argument, so duplicate here your argument to make counted the vote and to make easier the work of the language subcommittee.Crochet.david 15:57, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
  3. i can teach gilaki grammerfarshid 07:15, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
  4. we are intrested in survey on gilaki language213.217.32.90 07:19, 7 March 2008 (UTC)alborz
  5. i can write in gilaki about art213.217.32.90 07:23, 7 March 2008 (UTC)carol
    by same IP, different people? --Ali 11:24, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
    we are a family cant we send message from one computer?whyfarshid 08:05, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
  6. Support - I wholeheartedly support it! --Mirzali 22:35, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

Arguments againstEdit

  • This is one out of 5 proposals for a Gilaki wiki. Though Limburgish has so many proposals too there's a difference. There's no activity and Gilaki does not seem to be ready get for a Wikibooks, a Wikinews, a Wikiquote, a Wiktionary nor a Wikiversity. Maybe this will change in the future but not now. If there's any activity shown, I'll become in favour of this request. --OosWesThoesBes 15:56, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
  • --Ilaria - scrivimi 19:14, 18 August 2008 (UTC) Gilaki wikipedia has only 1500 articles
  • Oppose Oppose Bodhdharma (talk) 11:45, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

General discussionEdit

Although i support this project and i hope to having separate sub-domain, but i'm not sure to having at least 10 native & active contributers. --Ali 13:11, 22 January 2008 (UTC)