Requests for new languages/Wikipedia Inari Sami 2
|←main page||Request for a new language edition: Wikipedia Inari Sami 2|
- The community needs to develop an active test project; it must remain active until approval (automated statistics, recent changes). It is generally considered active if the analysis lists at least three active, not-grayed-out editors listed in the sections for the previous few months.
- The community needs to complete required MediaWiki interface translations in that language (about localization, translatewiki, check completion).
- The community needs to discuss and complete the settings table below:
|What||Value||Example / Explanation|
|Language code||smn (SIL, Ethnologue)||A valid ISO 639-1 or 639-3 language code, like "fr", "de", "nso", ...|
|Language name||Inari Sami||Language name in English|
|Language name||anarâškielâ||Language name in your language. This will appear in the language list on Special:Preferences, in the interwiki sidebar on other wikis, ...|
|Language Wikidata item||Q33462 - item has currently the following values:
||Item about the language at Wikidata. It would normally include the Wikimedia language code, name of the language, etc. Please complete at Wikidata if needed.|
|Project name||Wikipedia||"Wikipedia" in your language|
|Project namespace||usually the same as the project name|
|Project talk namespace||"Wikipedia talk" (the discussion namespace of the project namespace)|
|Enable uploads||no||Default is "no". Preferably, files should be uploaded to Commons.|
If you want, you can enable local file uploading, either by any user ("yes") or by administrators only ("admin").
Notes: (1) This setting can be changed afterwards. The setting can only be "yes" or "admin" at approval if the test creates an Exemption Doctrine Policy (EDP) first. (2) Files on Commons can be used on all Wikis. (3) Uploading fair-use images is not allowed on Commons (more info). (4) Localisation to your language may be insufficient on Commons.
|Project logo||135x135 PNG derivative from a decent SVG image (instructions)|
|Default project timezone||Europe/Helsinki||"Continent/City", e.g. "Europe/Brussels" or "America/Mexico City" (see list of valid timezones)|
|Additional namespaces||For example for a Wikisource which would need "Page", "Page talk", "Index", "Index talk"|
|Additional settings||the plural settings at CLDR and Unicode are incorrect for this language and need to be fixed.||Anything else that should be set|
This already has a wikipedia but was closed for this reason:
This discussion was created before the implementation of the Language proposal policy, and it is incompatible with the policy. Please open a new proposal in the format this page has been converted to (see the instructions). Do not copy discussion wholesale, although you are free to link to it or summarise it (feel free to copy your own comments over).
I support the inari sami wikipedia. The language is being revived ( fromm 279 in 2008 to up to 400 in 2018 ) so it will have more editors and the language can survive.
This does not have a closed Wikipedia. There was an old request that was closed; the Wikipedia was never opened. As per that old request, I will repeat the question about whether 300 speakers is really enough for a Wikipedia.--Prosfilaes (talk) 14:08, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
- Inari actualy has 400 speakers due to new revival attempts also i will learn inari very soon and i can make many pages - palmtree222
- Prosfilaes: for most languages, I would say no, 300–400 is more than likely not enough, but the Inari Saami community is highly productive and active online, the language is being used more and more in the media, by government agencies, etc. Not to mention they are motivated in creating an Inari Saami Wikipedia, translating the strings on MediaWiki, etc. I think that it will quickly bypass the Northern Saami Wikipedia in both quantity and quality. The quality is already there for a lot of articles. To the point that I've been using the Inari Saami incubator articles as the source text when creating articles into Northern Saami! I think this is a viable project and I have no qualms in recommending that this project be turned into a full-fledged Wikipedia of its own. -Yupik (talk) 14:48, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
Support. The project currently developed is of quality, with a great concern for articles that have a real content, the care given to the overall presentation and the use of sober and efficient templates, as well as the mention of sources, categories, and the insertion of many links and interwikis. The only thing I cannot judge is the linguistic quality of the articles. Beautiful project. Nevatovol (talk) 21:22, 25 June 2020 (UTC)