Requests for comment/Abd's disruption on Wikiversity

The following discussion is closed: inactive request that has seemingly been wrapped and summarised  — billinghurst sDrewth 22:59, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

Hello, can Admins or others provide oversight over this Wikiversity:Request_custodian_action#Abd's disruptions. Thank you. Sidelight12 (talk) 03:47, 10 September 2014 (UTC)


Sidelight12 (talk) 03:47, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
Probably best to keep this discussion on wv for now. Ajraddatz (talk) 04:01, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
Concur that enWV is able to manage and deal with this issue.  — billinghurst sDrewth 06:14, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
Ok, that's fine. I was saying the said user was soapboxing. Having a tendency is not illegal. I showed the history link to support that every single edit was only about that subject, now adding it was crosswiki, before a certain date. Plus, I wasn't after taking action on this user, I was taking action on someone else who created conflict and tried to embarrass on my page with a subject I didn't want to be associated with, when I acted. Sidelight12 (talk) 22:45, 12 September 2014 (UTC)