Requests for comment/Abd's disruption on Wikiversity

The following discussion is closed: inactive request that has seemingly been wrapped and summarised — billinghurst sDrewth 22:59, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, can Admins or others provide oversight over this Wikiversity:Request_custodian_action#Abd's disruptions. Thank you. Sidelight12 (talk) 03:47, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Rationale

Extended content

This was Abd's statement [1] "To avoid what led to the block I have a clear intention: not to become involved in Wikiversity governance and general maintenance. It was not welcome, even where I was enforcing long-established policy. I will work only on educational resources of interest to me and value to users." Yet he continues politics and getting involved in governance and general maintenance. Also conducts in harassment, systematic disruption, anarchic, and controlling behavior. He has been blocked from other wikis due to his behavior.

Conducted in sneaky behavior, in part by using email for resolution, then throwing his [[[2]] on my page, after temporarily letting him on it. Big mistake. This is because I took action, because the previous action taken was a joke. However, I did not want to be involved in that particular discussion, and Abd used that as an opportunity to use that for his harassment. [3] is justification of why I blocked of a certain user; or look Leucosticte's edit history prior to May https://en.wikiversity.org/w/index.php?limit=500&tagfilter=&title=Special%3AContributions&contribs=user&target=Leucosticte&namespace=&tagfilter=&year=2014&month=5. From the above link, abd unethically tried to pressure me to quit, because he had no case. Abd knows he has no case, and this is the only way he feels like he can get his way of promoting un-tolerated behavior.

Example of disruption by Abd pointed out by TeleComNasSprVen [4] then closing it with [5]. He continues to cause disruption about 'Augusto de Luca' on other wikis.

Abd knows he is not allowed on user's pages, such as Ottava Rima's [6] but annoys on his page anyways.

Constantly wars crosswiki with telecom. Example of hypocritical clownery from abd, [7] Abd's interactions are an irritant to many users.

Plays these kinds of revert games [8]. Argues that these [9] pictures are "educational" or something, and that everyone has to go through redtape to delete it. v:File:100 9317sml.jpg. One picture there is potentially educational, but the others are selfies.

[10] comment about behavior by Vituzzu.

Seeking permanent ban on Wikiversity, especially of email for Abd. Unblocking him again will only cause a headache for wiki users. I'm also bringing this to the attention of meta-wiki. His behavior harms wikiprojects. I've taken a semi-break since this mess.- Sidelight12 ^Talk 01:08, 10 September 2014 (UTC) (based on what is posted at Wikiversity:Request_custodian_action#Abd's disruptions)[reply]

Sidelight12 (talk) 03:47, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Probably best to keep this discussion on wv for now. Ajraddatz (talk) 04:01, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Concur that enWV is able to manage and deal with this issue. — billinghurst sDrewth 06:14, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, that's fine. I was saying the said user was soapboxing. Having a tendency is not illegal. I showed the history link to support that every single edit was only about that subject, now adding it was crosswiki, before a certain date. Plus, I wasn't after taking action on this user, I was taking action on someone else who created conflict and tried to embarrass on my page with a subject I didn't want to be associated with, when I acted. Sidelight12 (talk) 22:45, 12 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]