Piagam Gerakan/Dokumen Tambahan/Fungsi Penyelesaian Pertikaian Independen

This page is a translated version of the page Movement Charter/Supplementary Document/Independent Dispute Resolution Mechanism and the translation is 0% complete.

Outdated translations are marked like this.

Dokumen tambahan ini disediakan oleh Komite Perumus Piagam Gerakan untuk tujuan informasi dan menyediakan konteks lebih lanjut mengenai isi dari Piagam Gerakan Wikimedia. Dokumen ini bukan merupakan bagian dari Piagam, dan oleh karena itu tidak akan diikutsertakan dalam pemungutan suara ratifikasi. Namun, dokumen ini telah dikembangkan selama proses penelitian dan konsultasi MCDC. Ada beberapa jenis dokumen yang yang tersedia:

Informasi tentang topik yang berkaitan dengan Piagam.
Saran untuk kebijakan atau pengembangan proses atau pertimbangan oleh Dewan Global setelah Piagam ini diratifikasi.
Proses yang berkaitan dengan pemungutan suara untuk ratifikasi Piagam.

Bersamaan dengan penerbitan versi akhir Piagam Gerakan pada tanggal 10 Juni 2024, dokumen tambahan ini akan diperbarui pada tanggal 18 Juni 2024.

The Global Council is responsible for creating an independent dispute resolution mechanism, which is in turn guided by a dispute resolution policy developed by the Global Council. This mechanism applies when the Global Council, the Wikimedia Foundation or other Wikimedia Movement Bodies register a dispute about a decision affecting the global movement, and when reasonable efforts made using generally accepted decision-making and mediation processes remain inconclusive. This mechanism will also apply when the Global Council and the Wikimedia Foundation cannot resolve a conflict between them.

The mechanism will include details on escalation pathways, eligible parties, how a dispute is registered, who can trigger the mechanism, and at which point the mechanism (e.g., in the form of a jury) would come into effect. The arbitrators would be neutral, and form an ad-hoc body specific for the conflict (not a standing committee).

Conflicts should initially always be handled at the lowest possible level; the Independent Dispute Resolution mechanism would, however, shape policies that inform how to approach lower-level conflict—for instance, conflicts between Wikimedia communities and affiliates, and how these are escalated.

Recognizing that complex conflicts are context-dependent, this mechanism described will provide procedural guidance while maintaining flexibility. Specific mediators and arbitrators acting in the dispute resolution situation will depend on the involved parties in the dispute. If needed, independent advisors with expertise in mediation and arbitration can also be asked to participate in this process.

The Global Council should have a budget line item covering the costs of external mediation and arbitration.