Meta:Requests for adminship/Slade

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a closed Meta-Wiki request. Please do not modify it.

Slade edit

Even though the praxis on Meta is for users to self-nominate, I had a conversation with Slade, where he manifested interest in becoming a Meta Administrator, and he mentioned that it would be nice to be nominated, rather than self-nominate. Since this is a third-party nomination, I ask that the community wait until the candidate posts here confirming formally his acceptance of this nomination, at which time he will add the necessary identity confirmation to his userpage on at least one other project.

Slade is a trustworthy, hardworking user who has been contributing regularly on Meta roughly since May 2006, and registered since October 2005.

He also meets all the necessary criteria for Meta adminship with ease:

Administrator in not just one, but three other projects (Portuguese-language Wikipedia, Portuguese-language Wikinews and Portuguese-language Wikiquote)
Meta e-mail: enabled
at least 100 edits on Meta: Slade has more than 800 edits on Meta (Interiot's tool — despite the huge replication lag)
Meta userpage with links to userpage(s) on other projects: they are all there.

I expect that Slade would do a good job with the more laborious admin tasks that need doing around the website, and it would be beneficial for us to have a pt-N admin around. Redux 02:30, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Candidate's acceptance: Yes, I'd accept the nomination. -- Slade ♠ 16:40, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Support--Aphaia 17:26, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
support --.anaconda 17:30, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MaxSem 17:34, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
support -- as the nominator, of course. Redux 18:26, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support --M/ 23:28, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support yep —Pill δ 23:37, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support-- Mathmo 08:12, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support very good ^_^ --User:Dario vet/Sign 10:54, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
Support. xaosflux ^Talk 15:47, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Marbot 22:26, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support, looks like a good candidate. --Coredesat (en.wp) 05:14, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Apoio este utilizador. Grand master ka 09:20, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support. guillom 13:07, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Per users I trust. ++Lar: t/c 13:57, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per all the above. Also is a very friendly user and welcomes a lot of new users. --Sir James Paul 23:32, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose until signature is not a template. Naconkantari 16:01, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vote closed. Consensus reached (15/1), sysop flag granted.: --M/ 20:39, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]