Meta:Requests for adminship/Herbythyme
- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a closed Meta-Wiki request. Please do not modify it.
Herbythyme edit
While I have not been active on Meta for very long I have done some work on vandal fighting and tagging pages for deletion. I do realise there is no shortage of admins here on Meta however if folk feel one more might be useful I do know what to do with the tools. I am an admin on Commons and an admin with CU rights on en Wikibooks and meet the edit criteria on both. I do have an account on Wikipedia but am not particularly active there (nor likely to be). In the interests of completeness I have a withdrawn RfCU on Commons and started editing Wikipedia under another name - this redirects to me one way or another on active wikis. Meta e-mail is enabled and I do meet the edit criteria here. If this request were successful I would expect to be available to deal with vandals and inappropriate content as well as being able to access WM:SALT which might reduce some of the deletions (I'm used to using it on both other projects that I'm a sysop on), however I will try to help where I can. Thanks --Herby talk thyme 18:21, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support. --.anaconda 18:40, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support --Aphaia 18:42, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I was going to nominate him myself a bit later. MaxSem 19:11, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- support Don't see why not --dario vet (talk) 19:12, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Neutral Slade ♠ 19:33, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong support - he'll do lots of good work round here. Best of luck. Majorly (hot!) 20:31, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- support --Thogo (talk) 21:23, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Support Herbythyme is very active on Meta, especially on items related to administrators. He is constantly asking for blocks and has nominated many pages for deletion. He will do a lot with these tools. Cbrown1023 talk 21:46, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support as Cbrown. Joe 04:41, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support - Herby uses the tools to great benefit on every project he has them on. --SB_Johnny|talk|books 10:43, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support per nom, (and Aphaia, Cbrown, MaxSem and especially SBJohnny). I have worked with this user on several projects and workitems (he encouraged me to stand for CU on commons, among other things) and he "gets it", "has a deft hand" and is "not likely to go on a rampage" :) . Having as an admin here will be a major value add. ++Lar: t/c 13:06, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support. Seems trustworthy. ElinorD 23:24, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support --Fabexplosive 15:28, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Looks fine to me.--Poetlister 15:47, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support very active on RC patrolling--Nick1915 - all you want 17:00, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support --Brownout(msg) 20:01, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support --Jusjih 12:28, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Filnik 15:18, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Thunderhead 16:21, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support --Marbot 17:11, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support No problems here. Nishkid64 01:03, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support --M/ 13:25, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Good fellow Gaillimh 12:46, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support --Az1568 07:45, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Vote closed. User has been granted sysop's flag.
- --M/ 08:37, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Darn, too late. Support anyway :) guillom 10:46, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- My thanks to all for their support --Herby talk thyme 08:58, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]