Grants:Programs/Wikimedia Community Fund/Rapid Fund/Literacy for Sustainable Living Nigeria Art and Feminism English Wikipedia edit-a-thon (ID: 22058465)
This is an automatically generated Meta-Wiki page. The page was copied from Fluxx, the grantmaking web service of Wikimedia Foundation where the user has submitted their application. Please do not make any changes to this page because all changes will be removed after the next update. Use the discussion page for your feedback. The page was created by CR-FluxxBot.
Applicant Details edit
- Please provide your main Wikimedia Username.
Ngozi osadebe
- Please provide the Usernames of people related to this proposal.
Ngozi osadebe Ezimoo Beatrice ewa
- Organization
Literacy for Sustainable Living Nigeria
- Are you a member of any Wikimedia affiliate or group, including informal groups like Wiki Fan Clubs, emerging language communities, not recognized Wikimedia groups etc.? Please list them all.
We are members of the Art and Feminism group and an unrecognized Wikimedia group based at the University of Nigeria, Nsukka.
Grant Proposal edit
- M. Please state the title of your proposal. This will also be the Meta-Wiki page title.
Literacy for Sustainable Living Nigeria Art and Feminism English Wikipedia edit-a-thon
- Q. Indicate if it is a local, international, or regional proposal and if it involves several countries? (optional)
Local
- Q2. If you have answered regional or international, please write the country names and any other information that is useful for understanding your proposal.
- R. If you would like, please share any websites or social media accounts that your group or organization has.
- 1. What is the change that you are trying to bring about and why is this important.
Gender-based violence occurs in Nigeria on daily bases. there are also many publications on it from Nigerian authors as can be seen from google scholar. Unfortunately, gender-based violence in Nigeria has no coverage in Wikipedia, one of the most visited sites on the internet. A search on it using Petscan yielded zero results. Though there are topics such as violence against women, violence against men, gender-related violence, etc these articles treated the topic in generality, as such failed to threaten the topic in any cultural contest. It is important that articles on issues such as gender-based violence are written in the cultural context in which they occur to attract and retain the attention of their audience. It is therefore important that articles on gender-based violence in Nigeria are made available to Nigerian readers. Nigeria is the largest country in Africa with diverse geography and hundreds of languages. it is important that information on Nigeria is made available for Nigerian readers.
- 2. Describe your main approaches or strategies to achieve these changes and why you think they will be effective.
1. Invite the Postgraduate students of the Faculty of Social Sciences of my university to a discussion on the absence of articles on Gender based violence on Wikipedia.
- 2. Sell the idea of contributing content on Gender-based violence to Wikipedia to them by highlighting the importance of having the articles on Wikipedia.
- 3. Invite all the people that bought the idea to contribute content to Wikipedia on gender-based violence to a meeting to discuss procedures for implementing the idea.
- 4. Share responsibilities among the participants (who does what for the implementation of the idea)
- 5. Generate topic lists with which participants can work
- 6. Set up the dashboard to monitor contributions
- 7. Decide on a method of capturing participants' data
- 8. Decide on a method of equipping the participants with the skill to contribute high-quality content
- 9. Decide on a method of capturing learning
- 3. What are the activities you will be developing and delivering as part of these approaches or strategies?
1. Send out a notice of a meeting to would-be participants
- 2. Organize training for the participants
- 3. prepare a pre-training data gathering instrument
- 4. Are your activities part of a Wikimedia movement campaign or event? If so, please select the relevant campaign below. If so, please select all the relevant campaigns from the list below. If "other", please state which.
- 5. Do you have the team that is needed to implement this proposal?
- 6. Please state if your proposal aims to work to bridge any of the identified CONTENT knowledge gaps (Knowledge Inequity)? Select up to THREE that most apply to your work.
- 6.1 In a few sentences, explain how your work is specifically addressing this content gap (or Knowledge inequity) to ensure a greater representation of knowledge.
- 7. Please state if your proposal includes any of these areas or THEMATIC focus. Select up to THREE that most apply to your work and explain the rationale for identifying these themes.
- 8. Will your work focus on involving participants from any underrepresented communities?
- 9. Who are the target participants and from which community? How will you engage participants before and during the activities? How will you follow up with participants after the activities?
- 10. In what ways are you actively seeking to contribute towards creating a safer, supportive, more equitable environment for participants?
- 11. Please tell us about how you have let your Wikimedia communities know about the planned activities and this proposal. Use this space to describe the processes you carried out to make the community more involved in planning this proposal. Please link the on-wiki community discussion(s) around the proposals.
- 12. Are you aware of other Rapid Fund proposals in your local group, community, or region that are being submitted and that align with your proposed project?
If yes:
- 12.1 Did you explore the possibility of doing a joint proposal with other leaders in your group?
- N/A
- 12.2 How will this joint proposal allow you to have better results?
- N/A
- 13. Will you be working with other external, non-Wikimedia partners to implement this proposal? Required.
- 13.1 Please describe these partnerships and what motivates the potential partner to be part of the proposal and how they add value to your work.
- 14. In what ways do you think your proposal most contributes to the Movement Strategy 2030 recommendations. Select a maximum of THREE options that most apply.
Learning, Sharing, and Evaluation edit
- 15. What do you hope to learn from your work in this fund proposal?
- 16. Based on these learning questions, what is the information or data you need to collect to answer these questions? Please register this information (as metric description) in the following spaces provided.
| Main Open Metrics | Description | Target |
|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | N/A |
| N/A | N/A | N/A |
| N/A | N/A | N/A |
| N/A | N/A | N/A |
| N/A | N/A | N/A |
- 17. Core quantitative metrics.
| Core metrics | Description | Target |
|---|---|---|
| Number of participants | ||
| Number of editors | ||
| Number of organizers |
| Wikimedia Project | Description | Target |
|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | N/A |
| N/A | N/A | N/A |
| N/A | N/A | N/A |
| N/A | N/A | N/A |
| N/A | N/A | N/A |
- 17.1 If for some reason your proposal will not measure these core metrics please provide an explanation.
- 18. What tools would you use to measure each metric selected? Please refer to the guide for a list of tools. You can also write that you are not sure and need support.
Financial Proposal edit
- 19. & 19.1 What is the amount you are requesting from Wikimedia Foundation? Please provide this amount in your local currency.
- 19.2 What is this amount in US Currency (to the best of your knowledge)?
0 USD
- 20. Please upload your budget for this proposal or indicate the link to it.
- We/I have read the Application Privacy Statement, WMF Friendly Space Policy and Universal Code of Conduct.
No
Endorsements and Feedback edit
Please add endorsements and feedback to the grant discussion page only. Endorsements added here will be removed automatically.
Community members are invited to share meaningful feedback on the proposal and include reasons why they endorse the proposal. Consider the following:
- Stating why the proposal is important for the communities involved and why they think the strategies chosen will achieve the results that are expected.
- Highlighting any aspects they think are particularly well developed: for instance, the strategies and activities proposed, the levels of community engagement, outreach to underrepresented groups, addressing knowledge gaps, partnerships, the overall budget and learning and evaluation section of the proposal, etc.
- Highlighting if the proposal focuses on any interesting research, learning or innovation, etc. Also if it builds on learning from past proposals developed by the individual or organization, or other Wikimedia communities.
- Analyzing if the proposal is going to contribute in any way to important developments around specific Wikimedia projects or Movement Strategy.
- Analysing if the proposal is coherent in terms of the objectives, strategies, budget, and expected results (metrics).