Grants:Programs/Organizer Lab/testing organizer lab application

statusDraft
testing organizer lab application
proposed start date2022-12-01
proposed end date2022-12-15
grant start date2023-01-06T00:00:00Z
grant end date2023-01-31T00:00:00Z
budget (local currency)1 AMD
budget (USD)1 USD
amount recommended (USD)1
grant typeIndividual
decision fiscal year2022-23
applicant• testing
organization (if applicable)• N/A

This is an automatically generated Meta-Wiki page. The page was copied from Fluxx, the grantmaking web service of Wikimedia Foundation where the user has submitted their application. Please do not make any changes to this page because all changes will be removed after the next update. Use the discussion page for your feedback. The page was created by CR-FluxxBot.

Applicant Details

edit
Please provide your main Wikimedia Username.

testing

Please provide the Usernames of people related to this proposal.

N/A

Organization

N/A

Are you a member of any Wikimedia affiliate or group, including informal groups like Wiki Fan Clubs, emerging language communities, not recognized Wikimedia groups etc.? Please list them all.

No

Grant Proposal

edit
M. Please state the title of your proposal. This will also be the Meta-Wiki page title.

testing organizer lab application

1. What is the change that you are trying to bring about and why is this important.

testing

2. Describe your main approaches or strategies to achieve these changes and why you think they will be effective.

testing

3. What are the activities you will be developing and delivering as part of these approaches or strategies?

testing

4. Are your activities part of a Wikimedia movement campaign or event? If so, please select the relevant campaign below. If so, please select all the relevant campaigns from the list below. If "other", please state which.

Wikiforhumanrights, Wiki Loves Africa, Other (please specify)

testing
5. Do you have the team that is needed to implement this proposal?

testing

6. Please state if your proposal aims to work to bridge any of the identified CONTENT knowledge gaps (Knowledge Inequity)? Select up to THREE that most apply to your work.

Age (regency), Language

6.1 In a few sentences, explain how your work is specifically addressing this content gap (or Knowledge inequity) to ensure a greater representation of knowledge.

testing

7. Will your work focus on involving participants from any underrepresented communities?

Sexual Orientation, Geographic

8. Who are the target participants and from which community? How will you engage participants before and during the activities? How will you follow up with participants after the activities?

testing

9. In what ways are you actively seeking to contribute towards creating a safer, supportive, more equitable environment for participants?

testing

10. Please tell us about how you have let your Wikimedia communities know about the planned activities and this proposal. Use this space to describe the processes you carried out to make the community more involved in planning this proposal. Please link the on-wiki community discussion(s) around the proposals.

testing

11. Are you aware of other Organiser Lab proposals in your local group, community, or region that are being submitted and that align with your proposed project?

No

If yes:

11.1 Did you explore the possibility of doing a joint proposal with other leaders in your group?
N/A
11.2 How will this joint proposal allow you to have better results?
N/A
12. Will you be working with other external, non-Wikimedia partners to implement this proposal? Required.

No

12.1 Please describe these partnerships and what motivates the potential partner to be part of the proposal and how they add value to your work.

N/A

Learning, Sharing, and Evaluation

edit
13. What do you hope to learn from your work in this fund proposal?

testing

14. Based on these learning questions, what is the information or data you need to Filling out your main metrics.
Main Open Metrics Data
Main Open Metrics Description Target
one N/A 12
two N/A 14
three N/A 13
N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A
15. Core quantitative metrics.
Core Metrics Summary
Core metrics Description Target
Number of participants 14
Number of editors 43
Number of organizers 4343
Number of new content contributions per Wikimedia project
Wikimedia Project Description Target
Wikipedia N/A 43
Wikimedia Commons N/A 4343
N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A
16. What tools would you use to measure each metric selected? Please refer to the guide for a list of tools. You can also write that you are not sure and need support.

testing

Financial Proposal

edit
17. & 17.1 What is the amount you are requesting from Wikimedia Foundation? Please provide this amount in your local currency.

1 AMD

18. What is this amount in US Currency (to the best of your knowledge)?

1 USD

19. Please upload your budget for this proposal or indicate the link to it.


We/I have read the Application Privacy Statement, WMF Friendly Space Policy and Universal Code of Conduct.

Yes

Endorsements and Feedback

edit

Please add endorsements and feedback to the grant discussion page only. Endorsements added here will be removed automatically.

Community members are invited to share meaningful feedback on the proposal and include reasons why they endorse the proposal. Consider the following:

  • Stating why the proposal is important for the communities involved and why they think the strategies chosen will achieve the results that are expected.
  • Highlighting any aspects they think are particularly well developed: for instance, the strategies and activities proposed, the levels of community engagement, outreach to underrepresented groups, addressing knowledge gaps, partnerships, the overall budget and learning and evaluation section of the proposal, etc.
  • Highlighting if the proposal focuses on any interesting research, learning or innovation, etc. Also if it builds on learning from past proposals developed by the individual or organization, or other Wikimedia communities.
  • Analyzing if the proposal is going to contribute in any way to important developments around specific Wikimedia projects or Movement Strategy.
  • Analysing if the proposal is coherent in terms of the objectives, strategies, budget, and expected results (metrics).

Endorse